Darel Rex Finley in PhotoBooth

End Unsecured Debt

2007.12.03   prev     next

Every year in America, thousands of couples hit something called the “debt cliff.” After artificially enhancing their quality of life for months or even years with unsecured debt (i.e. credit cards), they hit the limit of what the credit card companies think they can pay back while still alive. Then boom the credit all stops, the interest rates all jack up to the maximum allowed by law (still very high), and the couple suddenly find themselves with an artificially low quality of life for now and far into the future — possibly for the rest of their lives!

quality
of
life
time

This graph shows the actual quality of life a couple can purchase with their income (black line), which experiences occasional, modest jumps as they get promoted or move into a higher paying job. The red line shows their quality of life as enhanced by unsecured debt.

What does hitting this cliff do to people? What does it do to their psyche and their general attitude about society?

I propose that we end it. Ban unsecured debt outright. Allow secured debt (home loan, car loan, etc.), but no unsecured debt. At all. Any more.

Of course, free-market proponents will cry foul. But should they?

When the price of a staple goes up, socialists want to legislate it back down, and capitalists want to leave it alone. I think the capitalists have the winning argument: The higher price serves the purpose of encouraging people to buy something else instead, and artificially holding it down will create nasty shortages, long lines, rushes, and all the other miserable crap that is the bane of attempts to legislate prices.

But what useful, economic purpose does the red-line scenario in the above graph serve? None! What bad, economic disaster will jump up if the red-line scenario is disallowed by law? Anyone? Anyone? Shoot me an e-mail when you know.

Most important of all: We know that higher prices are a signal to the citizen who faces them that it’s time to purchase less of that item and maybe look into cheaper alternatives. But what is a disastrous, life-wrecking debt cliff suppose to signal its victims to do? Nothing. Certainly nothing you’d want them to do, anyway.

The unsecured debt trap is the modern-day equivalent of indentured servitude. Nothing horrible happens to the free market as a result of indentured servitude being illegal. And if it was legal, a lot of really bad things would happen. Trust me.

- - - - -

 

Hear, hear

prev     next

Favorite links

Starbucks

Apple

Daring Fireball

RoughlyDrafted

Joel on Software

Macalope

Red Meat

Despair, Inc.

Zombie Survival Guide plus Dawn of the Dead (also check out HVZ)

Charlie Superfly Check “The First Time” to hear what she actually sang in the competition. HowardTV ripped it out and spliced in utter crap they had her sing later.

Real Solution #9 (Mambo Mania Mix) over stock nuke tests.

Ernie & Bert In Casino

Great Explanation of Star Wars

TV: Work Out; Confessions of A Matchmaker; Cavemen; Damages; The Shield

My vote for best commercial ever: Royal Bank of Scotland Group — wedding where groom says “Who among us will ever know?” I can’t find it on YouTube — anyone know where it might be?

Previous articles

Behavior and Free Will, Unconfused

“Reduced To” Absurdum

Suzie and Bubba Redneck — the Carriers of Intelligence

Everything You Need To Know About Haldane’s Dilemma

Darwin + Hitler = Baloney

Meta-ware

Designed For Combat

Speed Racer R Us

Bold — Uh-huh

Conscious of Consciousness

Future Perfect

Where Real and Yahoo Went Wrong

The Purpose of Surface

Eradicating Religion Won’t Eradicate War

Documentation Overkill

A Tale of Two Movies

The Changing Face of Sam Adams

Dinesh D’Souza On ID

Why Quintic (and Higher) Polynomials Have No Algebraic Solution

Translation of Paul Graham’s Footnote To Plain English

What Happened To Moore’s Law?

Goldston On ID

The End of Martial Law

The Two Faces of Evolution

A Fine Recommendation

Free Will and Population Statistics

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — D’Souza

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — Dennett

The Non-Euclidean Geometry That Wasn’t There

Defective Attitude Towards Suburbia

The Twin Deficit Phantoms

Sleep Sync and Vertical Hold

More FUD In Your Eye

The Myth of Rubbernecking

Keeping Intelligent Design Honest

Failure of the Amiga — Not Just Mismanagement

Maxwell’s Honey Do?

End Unsecured Debt

The Digits of Pi Cannot Be Sequentially Generated By A Computer Program

Faster Is Better

Goals Can’t Be Avoided

Propped-Up Products

Ignoring ID Won’t Work

The Crabs and the Bucket

Communism As A Side Effect of the Transition To Capitalism

Google and Wikipedia, Revisited

National Geographic’s Obesity BS

Cavemen

Theodicy Is For Losers

Seattle Redux

Quitting

Living Well

A Memory of Gateway

Is Apple’s Font Rendering Really Non-Pixel-Aware?

Humans Are Complexity, Not Choice

A Subtle Shift

Moralism — The Emperor’s New Success

Code Is Our Friend

The Edge of Religion

The Dark Side of Pixel-Aware Font Rendering

The Futility of DVD Encryption

ID Isn’t About Size or Speed

Blood-Curdling Screams

ID Venn Diagram

Rich and Good-Looking? Why Libertarianism Goes Nowhere

FUV — Fear, Uncertainty, and Vista

Malware Isn’t About Total Control

Howard = Second Coming?

Doomsday? Or Just Another Sunday

The Real Function of Wikipedia In A Google World

Objective-C Philosophy

Clarity From Cisco

2007 Macworld Keynote Prediction

FUZ — Fear, Uncertainty, and Zune

No Fear — The Most Important Thing About Intelligent Design

How About A Rational Theodicy

Napster and the Subscription Model

Intelligent Design — Introduction

The One Feature I Want To See In Apple’s Safari