Darel Rex Finley in 888


2008.06.09   prev     next

WHEN I was a teenager, my computer-loving friends and I spent a lot of time using computer software, programming, collecting hundreds of files on dozens of 5.25" floppy disks, and tricking out our computers with third-party circuit boards and custom-installed switches.

As I entered my late teens, though, I began to notice a trend among my computer friends and the software programs they wrote and used. A trend I didn’t really like. In my head, I came up with a name for this trend: Meta-ware.

Meta-ware was any software that existed only to manipulate and/or organize other software — for example, a program that alphabetized all the files on a disk. Or a program that scanned the contents of all your floppies and created a library of them. Or a program that assisted your code-writing efforts with keyboard shortcuts and special formatting. I don’t even recall all the meta-ware that was in use then, but I remember that there was a lot of it.

And gradually, I decided that I didn’t want to write meta-ware. I didn’t even really want to use it much except when I felt it very necessary. To me, a computer is great for a few basic things:

  • Games and multimedia

  • Writing/communicating

  • Drawing/photo processing

  • Scientific simulations

Most of my teenage computer friends seemed to be into computers for the sake of computers. The whole environment of circuit boards, blinking characters on a screen, keyboards, floppies, files — they really liked all that, as a hobby. I think this is a large part of the reason why I’ve gravitated to Apple products. Apple really seems to get this, in a way that the Windows PC world doesn’t. Still today, my most savvy Windows PC friends don’t like Apple primarily because they can’t build a Mac from parts, or overclock its processor to get 10% better performance than their computer-nerd buddy. They want to do that stuff. Apple targets people who don’t want to do that — they just want to do things that you really need a computer to do.

In Apple’s early years I thought of Steve Wozniak as the genius behind the company, and I regarded Steve Jobs as little more than a tag-along promoter. My opinion of Jobs hit an all-time low when a friend told me that Jobs didn’t even write code at Apple!

Today my opinion has reoriented 180° — I now regard Woz as someone who was into computers for computers’ sake, who built computers to impress his techie buddies, and who was just in the right place at the right time to make a zillion. And I now see Jobs as the visionary who wanted computers to do something really enjoyable for all those people who had no interest in building a computer or writing code. Which of these two ways of seeing computers had a big future ahead of it? It’s pretty obvious today.

I spent my late teens and post-teen years trying to become a successful game programmer. While my late-teen friends were showing off their program to organize files or to reformat code, I was trying to write an actual game. And of course I found out that it’s a lot harder to write an interesting, playable game than it is to write a utility that performs some file manipulation. Even seemingly simple games turn out to be fiendishly complicated when you actually have to create one yourself and make it work right. Maybe that’s part of what meta-ware is all about: avoiding the monumental task of making a game, a word processor, or a photo editor, and instead writing something relatively simple that provides some techie-oriented enhancement to the computer-using experience.

In college I found that the professors had virtually zero interest in writing anything that anyone would really like to use, much less teaching us how to write such an app. All they wanted to teach was programming theory, style, and methodology. As a college student I spent enormous effort making sure that my code satisfied some professor’s idea of what good code should look like. But what did that code actually do? Usually, nothing much. Writing a program to create an alphabetized word-count list from a text file was about as real-world-functional as any of our assignments got. Because computer code is complicated, a whole world of coding theory has grown up around the practice. Sadly, the true purpose of computers is lost in this world — computers and coding have become an end unto themselves.

As students of this academic world graduate and move into the corporate environment, they carry this mentality forward with them. How many programmers and separate code modules does it take to make a payment on an insurance policy? You don’t even want to know. Imagine a single, stale peanut surrounded by fifteen layers of wrapping and packaging, and it comes with an inch-thick rulebook describing how each layer of packaging works and is to be manipulated. Really makes you yearn for a good old Snickers bar. Yes, a Snickers bar needs a wrapper — but look how super thin that wrapper is! And how immensely thick the chocolate bar inside! What happens when the wrapper designers go nuts and start thinking they’re making the real product? You get something like the “architecture astronauts” described by Joel Spolsky (here and here):

The Architecture Astronauts will say things like: “Can you imagine a [peer-to-peer] program like Napster where you can download anything, not just songs?” Then they’ll build applications like Groove that they think are more general than Napster, but which seem to have neglected that wee little feature that lets you type the name of a song and then listen to it — the feature we wanted in the first place. Talk about missing the point. If Napster wasn’t peer-to-peer but it did let you type the name of a song and then listen to it, it would have been just as popular.

When I embarked on my two-year, half-hour-a-day hobby of writing SWTSG, I knew it was to satisfy my hunger to write code that really does something. Code that isn’t much more complex than the task at hand, but is nevertheless very complex because the task is complex. An app that does something really well, without degenerating into a geek’s dream of pointless controls and customization options. “I should be able to make my crawl text magenta.” Um, no, you shouldn’t. If you really want to, change its hue in your movie-editing app. I’m not putting in a control for that. Put it in yourself if you want to; the sourcecode is available.

On the internet I see people making pronouncements of what good code must be. “No decent text-handing app doesn’t understand Unicode.” Really? How about this instead: “No decent character-set specification requires programmers to abandon virtually universal ASCII except when they need to.” I don’t actually know if Unicode satisfies that statement or not. And I shouldn’t need to know.

“No app should use any processor time when idle. If I find that an app uses processor when idle, I throw it in the trash right away.” Really? When you find a cool app that does something really neato, and does it really well, and doesn’t need to be left open for extended periods of time when idle, and doesn’t seem to be slowing down your computing experience even when left open idle — you use a special utility to find out that the app is using a trickle of processor, then you trash it and never use it again? I don’t know whether to feel sorry for you or conclude you must be lying. I myself have tolerated truly annoying bugs in software (e.g. Photoshop) because it was a great app and I wanted to use it. (Incidentally, SWTSG now uses zero processor when idle. I found the workaround and deployed it.)

While developing SWTSG, I post a simple question to a C forum: Why can’t I pass a 2-D, non-dynamically allocated array to a function? Or pass a 1-D, non-dynamically allocated array to a function by its name only (myArray instead of &myArray[0])? To which I get half a dozen quick replies in the vein of “Yes you can; what’s your problem?” or “You must post your entire sourcecode before we can properly attempt to answer your question.” Finally, one helpful poster says, “Oh yeah, you’re right. You can’t do that, and here’s the official C FAQ statement to that effect.” Then I realize that all those other condescending posters hadn’t even tried to do it before responding to my question, and apparently had never written a programming project that caused them to attempt it, either.

When did the theory of computing become more important than the meat of writing useful code and lots of it? Anyone can look at someone else’s code and find a dozen reasons to dismiss it as crap. And if they can’t immediately tell how the code works at a glance (as almost certainly will be the case with code that does something even moderately complicated) it’s easy for them to think it really is crap.

Code is like art, in that any critic can arbitrarily laud or lambast any work — but getting large numbers of people to use it is the real proof of its value.

prev     next



Hear, hear

prev     next

Best Recent Articles

Method of Implementing A Secure Backdoor In Mobile Devices

When Starting A Game of Chicken With Apple, Expect To Lose

How I Clip My Cat’s Nails

Seasons By Temperature, Not Solstice

It’s Not A Criticism, It’s A Fact

Features (Regularly Updated)

A Memory of Gateway — news chronology of Apple’s ascendancy to the top of the technology mountain.

iPhone Party-Poopers Redux and Silly iPad Spoilsports — amusing litanies of industry pundits desperately hoping iPhone and iPad will go away and die.

Embittered Anti-Apple Belligerents — general anger at Apple’s gi-normous success.


My books

Now available on the iBookstore!



Daring Fireball

The Loop



Red Meat

Despair, Inc.

Real Solution #9 (Mambo Mania Mix) over stock nuke tests. (OK, somebody made them rip out the music — try this instead.)

Ernie & Bert In Casino

Great Explanation of Star Wars

Best commercials (IMO) from Superbowl 41, 43, 45, 46, and 47

Kirk & Spock get Closer

American football explained.

TV: Better Call Saul; Homeland; Survivor; The Jinx; Breaking Bad; Inside Amy Schumer

God’s kitchen

Celebrity Death Beeper — news you can use.

Making things for the web.

My vote for best commercial ever. (But this one’s a close second, and I love this one too.)

Recent commercials I admire: KFC, Audi

Best reggae song I’ve discovered in quite a while: Virgin Islands Nice

Pinball Arcade: Unbelievably accurate simulation of classic pinball machines from the late ’70s through the ’90s, with new ones added periodically. Like MAME for pinball — maybe better.

d120 dice: You too (like me) can be the ultimate dice nerd.

WiFi problems? I didn’t know just how bad my WiFi was until I got eero.

Favorite local pad thai: Pho Asian Noodle on Lane Ave. Yes, that place; blame Taco Bell for the amenities. Use the lime, chopsticks, and sriracha. Yummm.

Um, could there something wrong with me if I like this? Or this?

This entire site as a zip file — last updated 2018.02.01

Previous articles

Nothing More Angry Than A Cornered Anti-Apple

Let ’Em Glow

The Ultimate, Simple, Fair Tax

Compassion and Vision

When Starting A Game of Chicken With Apple, Expect To Lose

The Caveat

Superb Owl


Basic Reproduction Number

iBook Price-Fixing Lawsuit Redux — Apple Won

Delusion Made By Google

Religion Is A Wall

It’s Not A Criticism, It’s A Fact

Michigan Wolverines 2014 Football Season In Review

Sprinkler Shopping

Why There’s No MagSafe On the New Mac­Book

Sundar Pichai Says Devices Will Fade Away

The Question Every Ap­ple Naysayer Must An­swer

Apple’s Move To TSMC Is Fine For Apple, Bad For Samsung

Method of Implementing A Secure Backdoor In Mobile Devices

How I Clip My Cat’s Nails

Die Trying

Merger Hindsight

Human Life Decades

Fire and the Wheel — Not Good Examples of A Broken Patent System

Nobody Wants Public Transportation

Seasons By Temperature, Not Solstice

Ode To Coffee

Starting Over

FaceBook Messenger — Why I Don’t Use It

Happy Birthday, Anton Leeuwenhoek

Standard Deviation De­fined

Not Hypocrisy

Simple Guide To Pro­gress Bar Correctness

A Secure Backdoor Is Feasible

Don’t Blink

Predictive Value

Answering the Toughest Question About Disruption Theory

SSD TRIM Command In A Nutshell

The Enderle Grope

Aha! A New Way To Screw Apple

Champagne, By Any Other Maker

iOS Jailbreaking — A Perhaps-Biased Assessment

Embittered Anti-Apple Belligerents

Before 2001, After 2001

What A Difference Six Years Doesn’t Make

Stupefying New Year’s Stupidity

The Innovator’s Victory

The Cult of Free

Fitness — The Ultimate Transparency

Millions of Strange Dev­o­tees and Fanatics

Remember the iPod Killers?

Theory As Simulation

Four Analysts

What Was Christensen Thinking?

The Grass Is Always Greener — Viewing An­gle

Is Using Your Own Pat­ent Still Allowed?

The Upside-Down Tech Future

Motive of the Anti-Ap­ple Pundit

Cheating Like A Human

Disremembering Mi­cro­soft

Security-Through-Obscurity Redux — The Best of Both Worlds

iPhone 2013 Score Card

Dominant and Recessive Traits, Demystified

Yes, You Do Have To Be the Best

The United States of Texas

Vertical Disintegration

He’s No Jobs — Fire Him

A Players

McEnroe, Not Borg, Had Class

Conflict Fades Away

Four-Color Theorem A­nal­y­sis — Rules To Limit the Problem

The Unusual Mo­nop­o­list

Reasonable Projection

Five Times What They Paid For It

Bypassable Security Certificates Are Useless

I’d Give My Right Arm To Go To Mars

Free Advice About Apple’s iOS App Store Guidelines

Inciting Violence

One Platform

Understanding IDC’s Tablet Market Share Graph

I Vote Socialist Be­cause...

That Person

Product Naming — Google Is the Other Microsoft

Antecessor Hypotheticum

Apple Paves the Way For Apple

Why — A Poem

App Anger — the Supersized-Mastodon-In-the-Room That Marco Arment Doesn’t See

Apple’s Graphic Failure

Why Microsoft Copies Apple (and Google)

Coders Code, Bosses Boss

Droidfood For Thought

Investment Is Not A Sure Thing

Exercise is Two Thirds of Everything

Dan “Real Enderle” Ly­ons


Ignoring the iPod touch

Manual Intervention Should Never Make A Computer Faster

Predictions ’13


Zeroth — Why the Century Number Is One More Than the Year Number

Longer Than It Seems

Partners: Believe In Ap­ple

Gun Control: Best Ar­gu­ments

John C. Dvorak — Translation To English

Destructive Youth

Wiens’s Whine

Free Will — The Grand Equivocation

What Windows-vs.-Mac Actually Proved

A Tale of Two Logos

Microsoft’s Three Paths

Amazon Won’t Be A Big Winner In the DOJ’s Price-Fixing Suit

Infinite Sets, Infinite Authority

Strategy Analytics and Long Term Ac­count­a­bil­i­ty

The Third Stage of Computing

Why 1 Isn’t Prime, 2 Is Prime, and 2 Is the Only Even Prime

Readability BS

Lie Detection and Psy­chos



Microsoft’s Dim Pros­pects

Humanity — Just Barely

Hanke-Henry Calendar Won’t Be Adopted

Collatz Conjecture A­nal­y­sis (But No Proof; Sorry)

Rock-Solid iOS App Stability

Microsoft’s Uncreative Character

Microsoft’s Alternate Reality Bubble

Microsoft’s Three Ruts

Society’s Fascination With Mass Murder

PlaysForSure and Wikipedia — Revisionism At Its Finest


Patent Reform?

How Many Licks

Microsoft’s Incredible Run

Voting Socialist

Darwin Saves

The Size of Things In the Universe

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy That Wasn’t


Nobody Was In Love With Windows

Apples To Apples — How Anti-Apple Pundits Shoot Themselves In the Foot

No Holds Barred

Betting Against Hu­man­i­ty

Apple’s Premium Features Are Free

Why So Many Computer Guys Hate Apple

3D TV With No Glasses and No Parallax/Focus Issues

Waves With Particle-Like Properties

Gridlock Is Just Fine

Sex Is A Fantasy

Major Player

Why the iPad Wannabes Will Definitely Flop

Predators and Parasites

Prison Is For Lotto Losers

The False Dichotomy

Wait and See — Windows-vs-Mac Will Repeat Itself

Dishonesty For the Greater Good

Barr Part 2

Enough Information

Zune Is For Apple Haters

Good Open, Bad Open

Beach Bodies — Who’s Really Shallow?

Upgrade? Maybe Not

Eliminating the Im­pos­si­ble

Selfish Desires

Farewell, Pirate Cachet

The Two Risk-Takers

Number of Companies — the Idiocy That Never Dies

Holding On To the Solution

Apple Religion

Long-Term Planning

What You Have To Give Up

The End of Elitism

Good and Evil


How Religion Distorts Science

Laziness and Creativity

Sideloading and the Supersized-Mastodon-In-the-Room That Snell Doesn’t See

Long-Term Self-De­lu­sion

App Store Success Won’t Translate To Books, Movies, and Shows

Silly iPad Spoilsports

I Disagree

Five Rational Coun­ter­ar­gu­ments

Majority Report

Simply Unjust

Zooman Science

Reaganomics — Like A Diet — Works

Free R&D?

Apple’s On the Right Track

Mountains of Evidence

What We Do

Hope Conquers All

Humans Are Special — Just Not That Special

Life = Survival of the Fittest

Excuse Me, We’re Going To Build On Your Property

No Trademark iWorries


Twisted Excuses

The Fall of Google

Real Painters

The Meaning of Kicking Ass

How To Really Stop Casual Movie Disc Ripping

The Solitary Path of the High-Talent Pro­gram­mer

Fixing, Not Preaching

Why Blackmail Is Still Illegal

Designers Cannot Do Anything Imaginable

Wise Dr. Drew

Rats In A Too-Small Cage

Coming To Reason

Everything Isn’t Moving To the Web

Pragmatics, Not Rights

Grey Zone

Methodologically Dogmatic

The Purpose of Lan­guage

The Punishment Defines the Crime

Two Many Cooks


One Last Splurge

Making Money

What Heaven and Hell Are Really About

America — The Last Suburb


What the Cloud Isn’t For

Diminishing Returns

What You’re Seeing

What My Life Needs To Be

Taking An Early Re­tire­ment

Office Buildings

A, B, C, D, Pointless Relativity

Stephen Meyer and Michael Medved — Where Is ID Going?

If You Didn’t Vote — Complain Away

iPhone Party-Poopers Redux

What Free Will Is Really About

Spectacularly Well

Pointless Wrappers

PTED — The P Is Silent

Out of Sync

Stupid Stickers

Security Through Nor­mal­cy

The Case For Corporate Bonuses

Movie Copyrights Are Forever

Permitted By Whom?

Quantum Cognition and Other Hogwash

The Problem With Message Theory

Bell’s Boring Inequality and the Insanity of the Gaps

Paying the Rent At the 6 Park Avenue A­part­ments

Primary + Reviewer — An Alternative IT Plan For Corporations

Yes Yes Yes


Hey Hey Whine Whine

Microsoft About Microsoft Visual Microsoft Studio Microsoft

Hidden Purple Tiger

Forest Fair Mall and the Second Lamborghini

Intelligent Design — The Straight Dope

Maxwell’s Demon — Three Real-World Ex­am­ples


Entitlement BS



Einstein’s Error — The Confusion of Laws With Their Effects

The Museum Is the Art

Polly Sooth the Air Rage

The Truth

The Darkness

Morality = STDs?

Fulfilling the Moral Du­ty To Disdain



Real Design

The Two Rules of Great Programming


The End of the Nerds

Poverty — Humanity’s Damage Control

Berners-Lee’s Rating System = Google

The Secret Anti-MP3 Trick In “Independent Women” and “You Sang To Me”

ID and the Large Had­ron Collider Scare

Not A Bluff

The Fall of Microsoft

Life Sucks When You’re Not Winning


The Old-Fashioned Way

The Old People Who Pop Into Existence

Theodicy — A Big Stack of Papers

The Designed, Cause-and-Effect Brain


IC Counterarguments

The Capitalist’s Imaginary Line

Education Isn’t Eve­ry­thing

I Don’t Know

Funny iPhone Party-Poopers

Avoiding Conflict At All Costs

Behavior and Free Will, Unconfused

“Reduced To” Ab­sur­dum

Suzie and Bubba Redneck — the Carriers of Intelligence

Everything You Need To Know About Haldane’s Dilemma

Darwin + Hitler = Ba­lo­ney


Designed For Combat

Speed Racer R Us

Bold — Uh-huh

Conscious of Con­scious­ness

Future Perfect

Where Real and Yahoo Went Wrong

The Purpose of Surface

Eradicating Religion Won’t Eradicate War

Documentation Overkill

A Tale of Two Movies

The Changing Face of Sam Adams

Dinesh D’Souza On ID

Why Quintic (and Higher) Polynomials Have No Algebraic Solution

Translation of Paul Graham’s Footnote To Plain English

What Happened To Moore’s Law?

Goldston On ID

The End of Martial Law

The Two Faces of Ev­o­lu­tion

A Fine Rec­om­men­da­tion

Free Will and Population Statistics

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — D’Souza

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — Dennett

The Non-Euclidean Ge­om­e­try That Wasn’t There

Defective Attitude Towards Suburbia

The Twin Deficit Phan­toms

Sleep Sync and Vertical Hold

More FUD In Your Eye

The Myth of Rub­ber­neck­ing

Keeping Intelligent Design Honest

Failure of the Amiga — Not Just Mis­man­age­ment

Maxwell’s Silver Hammer = Be My Honey Do?

End Unsecured Debt

The Digits of Pi Cannot Be Sequentially Generated By A Computer Program

Faster Is Better

Goals Can’t Be Avoided

Propped-Up Products

Ignoring ID Won’t Work

The Crabs and the Bucket

Communism As A Side Effect of the Transition To Capitalism

Google and Wikipedia, Revisited

National Geographic’s Obesity BS


Theodicy Is For Losers

Seattle Redux


Living Well

A Memory of Gateway

Is Apple’s Font Rendering Really Non-Pixel-Aware?

Humans Are Complexity, Not Choice

A Subtle Shift

Moralism — The Emperor’s New Success

Code Is Our Friend

The Edge of Religion

The Dark Side of Pixel-Aware Font Rendering

The Futility of DVD En­cryp­tion

ID Isn’t About Size or Speed

Blood-Curdling Screams

ID Venn Diagram

Rich and Good-Looking? Why Libertarianism Goes Nowhere

FUV — Fear, Uncertainty, and Vista

Malware Isn’t About Total Control

Howard = Second Com­ing?

Doomsday? Or Just Another Sunday

The Real Function of Wikipedia In A Google World

Objective-C Philosophy

Clarity From Cisco

2007 Macworld Keynote Prediction

FUZ — Fear, Uncertainty, and Zune

No Fear — The Most Important Thing About Intelligent Design

How About A Rational Theodicy

Napster and the Subscription Model

Intelligent Design — Introduction

The One Feature I Want To See In Apple’s Safari.