Darel Rex Finley in 888

Delusion Made By Google

2016.10.10   prev     next

LAST Tuesday’s Google hardware reveal, though widely heralded by its cheerleaders as revolutionary, was really just a sad archetype of Google’s decade-long obsession with replacing Apple.

As noted by Daniel Eran Dilger in AppleInsider, the Pixel XL “costs the same as Apple’s iPhone 7 Plus but is half as fast, lacks Optical Image Stabilization, a telephoto lens, weather resistance, support for wide color gamut and stereo speakers.” The only things it has that the iPhone doesn’t are unlimited free cloud photo storage (iCloud gives you 5GB free, but you can pay $1/month for 50GB, or $3/month for 200GB), and a built-in analog headphone jack (iPhone includes a Lightning-to-analog adapter, and EarPods that plug directly to Lightning with no adapter needed). Why will consumers flock to a phone that costs just as much as an iPhone, yet features so much less (never mind the app situation)? We didn’t hear an answer to that from Google.

Dilger also points out that although the Android people like to pretend it’s the first time, this is actually Google’s fourth attempt to sell Google-branded handsets (G1, Nexus, Moto X, and now Pixel). And Google has had other hardware ventures that quickly flopped, for example, the modular Ara smartphones (hyped for years, then completely cancelled just a few weeks ago), and Nexus Q, the spherical, media streaming device that was terminated about a month after hitting the market. The new products announced on October 4th haven’t been released yet, so who knows what will happen — but there’s hardly anything new or revolutionary about Google coming out with yet more officially Google-specced hardware in the hopes that this time, those products will take off like rockets.

The event itself was stunningly anemic. Take a look, and try to imagine Apple getting away with a delivery like this. Apple’s detractors like to say that Tim Cook is no Steve Jobs when it comes to charismatic presentation — but the key speakers at this function make Cook look like a seasoned pro. The venue and audience were remarkably small, and strangely unreceptive: When the guy launching Pixel made an anti-iPhone barb about camera bumps, and paused for audience laughter, he was met with dead silence, which he then tried to cover with his own, uncertain snicker.

The Pixel’s camera was hyped as the best ever in a smartphone, while neglecting to mention that the already-released iPhone 7 and 7 Plus weren’t included in that test — but, of course, the unreleased Pixel was. (This at the same time that the presenters had no problem comparing Pixel to i­Phone when it came to camera bumps and analog jacks.)

The hardware announcements rounded out with me-too answers to eero and the Echo, plus a niced-up, plastic-and-cloth version of Google cardboard (slip your smartphone into a pair of goggle-like glasses to make a cheap VR system) — but which works only with the Pixel phone. (And costs only $80.)

The show led off with heavy promotion of the hot, new, anti-Apple meme: We’re all headed toward an AI-first, not-device-first world (in which Google can and probably will dominate Apple). This craze is uncritically endorsed by the same sort of people who for many years pushed “Apple will get commoditized out of its markets,” until that certitude started looking so tired and clueless that any remotely plausible, new, Apple’s-going-down theory was immediately preferable. The message would’ve been a lot more convincing if it had taken up the majority of the presentation, followed with a $200 phone that, yes, isn’t as good as an iPhone, but it’s much cheaper, and what does it really matter how good the phone is, when we’re all going to be living in an AI-first world anyway? That would have been at least consistent. But no, instead, we got a phone that’s trying very hard to be as good as Apple’s top-of-the-line iPhone — while successfully duplicating mainly the price. Google’s whole presentation belied the AI-first-not-device-first theme.

A lot of what they presented is future-oriented, e.g. fully synthesized speech. Sounds great, but it’s not a shipping product, and we don’t know what Apple’s working on, because Apple doesn’t hype its private roadmap in public presentations. Comparing Google’s future plans to Apple’s shipping products certainly makes Google look superior — but also backfires by discouraging people from buying Apple’s competitors’ shipping products today.

To really understand how misguided this whole event was, go to apple.com and take a look at all the gorgeous product imagery and animated, learn-more links. Then go to google.com and what do you see? What you’ve always seen there: a simple search engine. People go to Google to search the web, not to learn about cool, Apple-style hardware.

You have to go to madeby.google.com (not linked at all from google.com that I could see!) to find Google’s extremely obvious, shameless copy of apple.com. It looks just like one of those Microsoft stores trying to supplant Apple’s phenomenally successful retail operation: If we build something that looks about the same, people will stop getting stuff from Apple, and start getting it from us! It’s been the haggard delusion of many major tech companies for at least the past fifteen years, with Google a prominent member. Google’s whole attitude about this seems to be: We must drive Apple out of hardware dominance. Why? Because we can! And we know we can, because Windows did it to the Mac in the ’80s, right? (Not exactly.) And all those people who use iPhones? They don’t really want to keep buying Apple products; they’re just waiting for the right non-Apple phone to appear, so they can say bye-bye to Apple for good!

Google’s Mountain View headquarters may indeed be populated with guys who think that way, but the society outside of that campus most definitely is not. In the real world, when a revolutionary product comes along (think iPhone in 2007), we all know it, because it’s radically different and better than the best stuff we had yesterday. Google’s October 4th hardware presentation wasn’t even revolutionary in terms of marking a new strategy for Google.


Update 2017.10.04 — Although the second annual “Made By Google” event is noticeably improved in overall quality compared to the first one, still, pretty much everything I said a year ago applies today. The big question is, how has it been going?

Rick Osterloh, the main speaker, bragged about sales of video dongles and routers, but then seconds later glaringly avoided any talk of Pixel phone sales, instead finding other ways to praise that product:

And Pixel had a great year. I just wish we had a few more of them to go around, but user satisfaction among Pixel owners is among the highest of any Google product ever. Industry analysts and the media gave Pixel rave reviews too. Our performance scores led the industry. And Pixel had the best and top-rated smartphone camera. We’re really proud of how well the Pixel did, for our first-generation smartphone in such a competitive space.

I’m not sure what exactly Osterloh is proud of, but in mid-June Ars Technica ran a story claiming that per the Google Play Store’s own internal metrics, Pixel couldn’t have sold more than a million units. A million in eight months puts it at far less than 1% of iPhone sales in the same period — very similar sales territory as Windows Phone just before Microsoft shut it down. And “performance scores?” Apple’s mobile processors are much faster than those used in any non-Apple phone.

Osterloh (as well as other speakers) bubbled about how Google’s just getting started on this stuff:

This is what it means to design hardware from the inside out. It’s this combination of AI, software, and hardware, working together, that provides a helpful experience for our users. And that’s where the big leaps forward are gonna happen in the next ten years. We’re still in the early days for our hardware line, but we know what it takes to build great products in a crowded field. We weren’t first with many of our successful products.

If your product isn’t first, then it needs to be radically better than what’s already out there. That’s what Google search was in 1998. That’s what iPhone was in 2007. That’s not what Pixel is today. And pretty much every product Google showed in this event (and there were many) is precious little more than a shameless, me-too copy of something from Apple or eero.

This event feels very much like Microsoft events from the Steve Ballmer 2000s: It would’ve been really great in an alternate universe where Apple, eero, and a few other companies just didn’t exist, and the Google guys thought up all this stuff on their own. In the 2000s, Microsoft was making immense billions from Windows/Office licensing (still today most of their revenue), and they blew incredible amounts of that money trying to recreate/rebrand Apple’s successful products as if Microsoft had invented them first. With Ballmer finally given the boot, Microsoft more recently seems to have at least partially woken up from this very expensive daydream. Google, however, is deep in the throes of it, and seems perfectly content to spend incredible a­mounts of its web-search profits on this fantasy.

It couldn’t be clearer that Google very much wants to replicate Ap­ple’s successes. But what it’s actually replicating is Microsoft’s fail­ures.


Update 2017.11.20 — Google’s Pixel Buds (AirPods wannabe) getting bad reviews all around.


prev     next



Hear, hear

prev     next

Best Recent Articles

Method of Implementing A Secure Backdoor In Mobile Devices

When Starting A Game of Chicken With Apple, Expect To Lose

How I Clip My Cat’s Nails

Seasons By Temperature, Not Solstice

It’s Not A Criticism, It’s A Fact

Features (Regularly Updated)

A Memory of Gateway — news chronology of Apple’s ascendancy to the top of the technology mountain.

iPhone Party-Poopers Redux and Silly iPad Spoilsports — amusing litanies of industry pundits desperately hoping iPhone and iPad will go away and die.

Embittered Anti-Apple Belligerents — general anger at Apple’s gi-normous success.


My books

Now available on the iBookstore!



Daring Fireball

The Loop



Red Meat

Despair, Inc.

Real Solution #9 (Mambo Mania Mix) over stock nuke tests. (OK, somebody made them rip out the music — try this instead.)

Ernie & Bert In Casino

Great Explanation of Star Wars

Best commercials (IMO) from Superbowl 41, 43, 45, 46, and 47

Kirk & Spock get Closer

American football explained.

TV: Better Call Saul; Homeland; Survivor; The Jinx; Breaking Bad; Inside Amy Schumer

God’s kitchen

Celebrity Death Beeper — news you can use.

Making things for the web.

My vote for best commercial ever. (But this one’s a close second, and I love this one too.)

Recent commercials I admire: KFC, Audi

Best reggae song I’ve discovered in quite a while: Virgin Islands Nice

Pinball Arcade: Unbelievably accurate simulation of classic pinball machines from the late ’70s through the ’90s, with new ones added periodically. Like MAME for pinball — maybe better.

d120 dice: You too (like me) can be the ultimate dice nerd.

WiFi problems? I didn’t know just how bad my WiFi was until I got eero.

Favorite local pad thai: Pho Asian Noodle on Lane Ave. Yes, that place; blame Taco Bell for the amenities. Use the lime, chopsticks, and sriracha. Yummm.

Um, could there something wrong with me if I like this? Or this?

This entire site as a zip file — last updated 2018.02.01

Previous articles

Nothing More Angry Than A Cornered Anti-Apple

Let ’Em Glow

The Ultimate, Simple, Fair Tax

Compassion and Vision

When Starting A Game of Chicken With Apple, Expect To Lose

The Caveat

Superb Owl


Basic Reproduction Number

iBook Price-Fixing Lawsuit Redux — Apple Won

Delusion Made By Google

Religion Is A Wall

It’s Not A Criticism, It’s A Fact

Michigan Wolverines 2014 Football Season In Review

Sprinkler Shopping

Why There’s No MagSafe On the New Mac­Book

Sundar Pichai Says Devices Will Fade Away

The Question Every Ap­ple Naysayer Must An­swer

Apple’s Move To TSMC Is Fine For Apple, Bad For Samsung

Method of Implementing A Secure Backdoor In Mobile Devices

How I Clip My Cat’s Nails

Die Trying

Merger Hindsight

Human Life Decades

Fire and the Wheel — Not Good Examples of A Broken Patent System

Nobody Wants Public Transportation

Seasons By Temperature, Not Solstice

Ode To Coffee

Starting Over

FaceBook Messenger — Why I Don’t Use It

Happy Birthday, Anton Leeuwenhoek

Standard Deviation De­fined

Not Hypocrisy

Simple Guide To Pro­gress Bar Correctness

A Secure Backdoor Is Feasible

Don’t Blink

Predictive Value

Answering the Toughest Question About Disruption Theory

SSD TRIM Command In A Nutshell

The Enderle Grope

Aha! A New Way To Screw Apple

Champagne, By Any Other Maker

iOS Jailbreaking — A Perhaps-Biased Assessment

Embittered Anti-Apple Belligerents

Before 2001, After 2001

What A Difference Six Years Doesn’t Make

Stupefying New Year’s Stupidity

The Innovator’s Victory

The Cult of Free

Fitness — The Ultimate Transparency

Millions of Strange Dev­o­tees and Fanatics

Remember the iPod Killers?

Theory As Simulation

Four Analysts

What Was Christensen Thinking?

The Grass Is Always Greener — Viewing An­gle

Is Using Your Own Pat­ent Still Allowed?

The Upside-Down Tech Future

Motive of the Anti-Ap­ple Pundit

Cheating Like A Human

Disremembering Mi­cro­soft

Security-Through-Obscurity Redux — The Best of Both Worlds

iPhone 2013 Score Card

Dominant and Recessive Traits, Demystified

Yes, You Do Have To Be the Best

The United States of Texas

Vertical Disintegration

He’s No Jobs — Fire Him

A Players

McEnroe, Not Borg, Had Class

Conflict Fades Away

Four-Color Theorem A­nal­y­sis — Rules To Limit the Problem

The Unusual Mo­nop­o­list

Reasonable Projection

Five Times What They Paid For It

Bypassable Security Certificates Are Useless

I’d Give My Right Arm To Go To Mars

Free Advice About Apple’s iOS App Store Guidelines

Inciting Violence

One Platform

Understanding IDC’s Tablet Market Share Graph

I Vote Socialist Be­cause...

That Person

Product Naming — Google Is the Other Microsoft

Antecessor Hypotheticum

Apple Paves the Way For Apple

Why — A Poem

App Anger — the Supersized-Mastodon-In-the-Room That Marco Arment Doesn’t See

Apple’s Graphic Failure

Why Microsoft Copies Apple (and Google)

Coders Code, Bosses Boss

Droidfood For Thought

Investment Is Not A Sure Thing

Exercise is Two Thirds of Everything

Dan “Real Enderle” Ly­ons


Ignoring the iPod touch

Manual Intervention Should Never Make A Computer Faster

Predictions ’13


Zeroth — Why the Century Number Is One More Than the Year Number

Longer Than It Seems

Partners: Believe In Ap­ple

Gun Control: Best Ar­gu­ments

John C. Dvorak — Translation To English

Destructive Youth

Wiens’s Whine

Free Will — The Grand Equivocation

What Windows-vs.-Mac Actually Proved

A Tale of Two Logos

Microsoft’s Three Paths

Amazon Won’t Be A Big Winner In the DOJ’s Price-Fixing Suit

Infinite Sets, Infinite Authority

Strategy Analytics and Long Term Ac­count­a­bil­i­ty

The Third Stage of Computing

Why 1 Isn’t Prime, 2 Is Prime, and 2 Is the Only Even Prime

Readability BS

Lie Detection and Psy­chos



Microsoft’s Dim Pros­pects

Humanity — Just Barely

Hanke-Henry Calendar Won’t Be Adopted

Collatz Conjecture A­nal­y­sis (But No Proof; Sorry)

Rock-Solid iOS App Stability

Microsoft’s Uncreative Character

Microsoft’s Alternate Reality Bubble

Microsoft’s Three Ruts

Society’s Fascination With Mass Murder

PlaysForSure and Wikipedia — Revisionism At Its Finest


Patent Reform?

How Many Licks

Microsoft’s Incredible Run

Voting Socialist

Darwin Saves

The Size of Things In the Universe

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy That Wasn’t


Nobody Was In Love With Windows

Apples To Apples — How Anti-Apple Pundits Shoot Themselves In the Foot

No Holds Barred

Betting Against Hu­man­i­ty

Apple’s Premium Features Are Free

Why So Many Computer Guys Hate Apple

3D TV With No Glasses and No Parallax/Focus Issues

Waves With Particle-Like Properties

Gridlock Is Just Fine

Sex Is A Fantasy

Major Player

Why the iPad Wannabes Will Definitely Flop

Predators and Parasites

Prison Is For Lotto Losers

The False Dichotomy

Wait and See — Windows-vs-Mac Will Repeat Itself

Dishonesty For the Greater Good

Barr Part 2

Enough Information

Zune Is For Apple Haters

Good Open, Bad Open

Beach Bodies — Who’s Really Shallow?

Upgrade? Maybe Not

Eliminating the Im­pos­si­ble

Selfish Desires

Farewell, Pirate Cachet

The Two Risk-Takers

Number of Companies — the Idiocy That Never Dies

Holding On To the Solution

Apple Religion

Long-Term Planning

What You Have To Give Up

The End of Elitism

Good and Evil


How Religion Distorts Science

Laziness and Creativity

Sideloading and the Supersized-Mastodon-In-the-Room That Snell Doesn’t See

Long-Term Self-De­lu­sion

App Store Success Won’t Translate To Books, Movies, and Shows

Silly iPad Spoilsports

I Disagree

Five Rational Coun­ter­ar­gu­ments

Majority Report

Simply Unjust

Zooman Science

Reaganomics — Like A Diet — Works

Free R&D?

Apple’s On the Right Track

Mountains of Evidence

What We Do

Hope Conquers All

Humans Are Special — Just Not That Special

Life = Survival of the Fittest

Excuse Me, We’re Going To Build On Your Property

No Trademark iWorries


Twisted Excuses

The Fall of Google

Real Painters

The Meaning of Kicking Ass

How To Really Stop Casual Movie Disc Ripping

The Solitary Path of the High-Talent Pro­gram­mer

Fixing, Not Preaching

Why Blackmail Is Still Illegal

Designers Cannot Do Anything Imaginable

Wise Dr. Drew

Rats In A Too-Small Cage

Coming To Reason

Everything Isn’t Moving To the Web

Pragmatics, Not Rights

Grey Zone

Methodologically Dogmatic

The Purpose of Lan­guage

The Punishment Defines the Crime

Two Many Cooks


One Last Splurge

Making Money

What Heaven and Hell Are Really About

America — The Last Suburb


What the Cloud Isn’t For

Diminishing Returns

What You’re Seeing

What My Life Needs To Be

Taking An Early Re­tire­ment

Office Buildings

A, B, C, D, Pointless Relativity

Stephen Meyer and Michael Medved — Where Is ID Going?

If You Didn’t Vote — Complain Away

iPhone Party-Poopers Redux

What Free Will Is Really About

Spectacularly Well

Pointless Wrappers

PTED — The P Is Silent

Out of Sync

Stupid Stickers

Security Through Nor­mal­cy

The Case For Corporate Bonuses

Movie Copyrights Are Forever

Permitted By Whom?

Quantum Cognition and Other Hogwash

The Problem With Message Theory

Bell’s Boring Inequality and the Insanity of the Gaps

Paying the Rent At the 6 Park Avenue A­part­ments

Primary + Reviewer — An Alternative IT Plan For Corporations

Yes Yes Yes


Hey Hey Whine Whine

Microsoft About Microsoft Visual Microsoft Studio Microsoft

Hidden Purple Tiger

Forest Fair Mall and the Second Lamborghini

Intelligent Design — The Straight Dope

Maxwell’s Demon — Three Real-World Ex­am­ples


Entitlement BS



Einstein’s Error — The Confusion of Laws With Their Effects

The Museum Is the Art

Polly Sooth the Air Rage

The Truth

The Darkness

Morality = STDs?

Fulfilling the Moral Du­ty To Disdain



Real Design

The Two Rules of Great Programming


The End of the Nerds

Poverty — Humanity’s Damage Control

Berners-Lee’s Rating System = Google

The Secret Anti-MP3 Trick In “Independent Women” and “You Sang To Me”

ID and the Large Had­ron Collider Scare

Not A Bluff

The Fall of Microsoft

Life Sucks When You’re Not Winning


The Old-Fashioned Way

The Old People Who Pop Into Existence

Theodicy — A Big Stack of Papers

The Designed, Cause-and-Effect Brain


IC Counterarguments

The Capitalist’s Imaginary Line

Education Isn’t Eve­ry­thing

I Don’t Know

Funny iPhone Party-Poopers

Avoiding Conflict At All Costs

Behavior and Free Will, Unconfused

“Reduced To” Ab­sur­dum

Suzie and Bubba Redneck — the Carriers of Intelligence

Everything You Need To Know About Haldane’s Dilemma

Darwin + Hitler = Ba­lo­ney


Designed For Combat

Speed Racer R Us

Bold — Uh-huh

Conscious of Con­scious­ness

Future Perfect

Where Real and Yahoo Went Wrong

The Purpose of Surface

Eradicating Religion Won’t Eradicate War

Documentation Overkill

A Tale of Two Movies

The Changing Face of Sam Adams

Dinesh D’Souza On ID

Why Quintic (and Higher) Polynomials Have No Algebraic Solution

Translation of Paul Graham’s Footnote To Plain English

What Happened To Moore’s Law?

Goldston On ID

The End of Martial Law

The Two Faces of Ev­o­lu­tion

A Fine Rec­om­men­da­tion

Free Will and Population Statistics

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — D’Souza

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — Dennett

The Non-Euclidean Ge­om­e­try That Wasn’t There

Defective Attitude Towards Suburbia

The Twin Deficit Phan­toms

Sleep Sync and Vertical Hold

More FUD In Your Eye

The Myth of Rub­ber­neck­ing

Keeping Intelligent Design Honest

Failure of the Amiga — Not Just Mis­man­age­ment

Maxwell’s Silver Hammer = Be My Honey Do?

End Unsecured Debt

The Digits of Pi Cannot Be Sequentially Generated By A Computer Program

Faster Is Better

Goals Can’t Be Avoided

Propped-Up Products

Ignoring ID Won’t Work

The Crabs and the Bucket

Communism As A Side Effect of the Transition To Capitalism

Google and Wikipedia, Revisited

National Geographic’s Obesity BS


Theodicy Is For Losers

Seattle Redux


Living Well

A Memory of Gateway

Is Apple’s Font Rendering Really Non-Pixel-Aware?

Humans Are Complexity, Not Choice

A Subtle Shift

Moralism — The Emperor’s New Success

Code Is Our Friend

The Edge of Religion

The Dark Side of Pixel-Aware Font Rendering

The Futility of DVD En­cryp­tion

ID Isn’t About Size or Speed

Blood-Curdling Screams

ID Venn Diagram

Rich and Good-Looking? Why Libertarianism Goes Nowhere

FUV — Fear, Uncertainty, and Vista

Malware Isn’t About Total Control

Howard = Second Com­ing?

Doomsday? Or Just Another Sunday

The Real Function of Wikipedia In A Google World

Objective-C Philosophy

Clarity From Cisco

2007 Macworld Keynote Prediction

FUZ — Fear, Uncertainty, and Zune

No Fear — The Most Important Thing About Intelligent Design

How About A Rational Theodicy

Napster and the Subscription Model

Intelligent Design — Introduction

The One Feature I Want To See In Apple’s Safari.