Darel Rex Finley in 888

The End of Elitism

2010.07.22   prev     next

THE iPad was inevitable, in the sense that a sealed market — i.e. one that doesn’t allow free copying of executables — one day was going to unite with a well-built OS, a slick UI, and a relatively easy, low-entry-cost app SDK. Eventually, it was gonna happen. and when it did happen, there was gonna be a whole bunch of developers who were gonna hate it, and come up with all kinds of reasons to say that it’s bad. But it was going to be successful anyway because there’re so many more developers who want freedom from piracy, and as soon as somebody came out with a system like that, then boom, it was gonna be a huge success. (The only question remaining is whether the government will legislate it out of existence, which would just postpone the transformation of computing for several years or a few decades, until some other leglislature repeals.)

It was inevitable — but it didn’t have to be Apple. It very nearly wasn’t. Apple almost died in the ’90s. Steve Jobs had a close brush with cancer before the iPad was even under development, then dodged another health bullet months before the product was announced. It very nearly wasn’t Apple, but it was gonna be somebody. Somebody, eventually, was gonna come out with a good computer with a totally piracy-protected system; one that there’s no easy way to rampantly pirate around. And once they did that, a ton of really good developers were gonna come out of the woodwork, and start writing a ton of great apps for it. And the other kind of developers, the ones who were developing just for the sake of developing, they were gonna be really pissed-off, because that’s not the kind of computer they ever wanted. I think Alex Payne put it quite succinctly:

The iPad is an attractive, thoughtfully designed, deeply cynical thing.

Is it cynicism to think that the great majority of potential app developers can’t be expected to hold down a day job at XYZ Corp. and also develop great apps in their spare time for little or no extra money? Or is it just realism?

To me, one of the epiphanic moments in the maturation of computing was when Betrand Serlet, deriding Vista in an Apple keynote, said of Windows hard-drive disk defragmentation utilities: “No end-user should ever have to know about that.” Precisely. A lot of computer nerds think that running a technical app that analyzes and defragments your hard drive, while showing you a schematic of what it’s doing, is really cool, and part of what computing is about. Apple is maybe the first computer company to fully realize that hard-drive maintenance, including defragmentation, is something that the OS should silently do in the background without the user (even if that user happens to be a skilled developer) ever knowing that it’s happening.

Aside from file fragmentation, another issue hard drives have to deal with is sectors that appear to be functional at the outset, but degrade and go bad over time. All hard drives, or so I’ve heard, come with a built-in set of spare sectors that aren’t included as part of the drive’s official capacity. When the drive’s hardware detects that one of the regular sectors is starting to go bad, it automatically copies that sector’s data to one of the spare sectors, then marks the original sector as “bad,” so it won’t get used again. This greatly increases the life and reliability of the drive — and it’s done entirely transparently, meaning that the OS (not to mention the human user) doesn’t even know it’s happening. Serlet’s observation was that defragmentation should be performed by the OS just as transparently to the user.


As computing matures in the coming years, a whole lot of IT people’s jobs are going to disappear. And it looks like this is going to be intimately intertwined with the world using Apple’s products. Apple’s philosophy is that all of these technical issues involved with personal computing should be solved in advance at Apple, and then no one should have to jack with them elsewhere.

What’s going to happen to all those IT people? They’re going to have to go get a new job doing something else, and for a lot less money. And that’s why so many of them hate Apple. They can see it coming.

Access, and Humanity’s New Phase

The modern technology developed in the past fifty years or so — in particular the internet — has brought an abrupt and complete end to the phenomenon of elitism, at least in the advanced parts of the world.

Elitism in almost every area has been based on physical access. The elite consisted of those who had physical access to a particular thing. Of course, this elite always pretended (or sometimes really believed) that their elite position was based on superior comprehension and appreciation, when in reality it usually wasn’t.

For generations before the invention of the camera and printing, only a small minority of the population had ready access to fine art, and this elite art crowd of course presumed itself to have special understanding and appreciation of art, of which few commoners would be capable. When the camera and photographic mass-production ruined the privilege of access, by making fine art available to most everyone, then the elite art crowd had to turn its favors toward something most everyone wouldn’t like: the grotesque, the bizarre, the abstract, and the quixotic — i.e. what we now call “modern art” — to maintain its position as a passable elite. (See Mechanism pp. 133-35.)

Before the advent of the personal computer, an elite group of individuals had access to, and control of, computing. If you wanted to program computers, you had to get in the good graces of this priesthood, and go along with their pretense of superiority. Today, anyone who has a desktop or laptop computer (meaning most people) can download a development system like Xcode for free and start writing apps immediately. How much processor is your app using? Not anyone’s problem but yours. What percent of the computer’s processor are you allowed to use for a significant period of time? 99.9%, or whatever the OS isn’t already using. What finicky, annoying persons do you have to pretend to be friendly with in order to be able to code at all? How about none.

Higher education — while undoubtedly providing some necessary information (to become a doctor, chemist, or lawyer, for example) and necessary certification (i.e. the consequences of going to an uninformed doctor are a lot more than losing your money) — is badly riddled with elitist pomposity; whacky, useless, theories whose only real purpose is to elevate the theorizer to an apparent position of superior comprehension and mentorship. In generations past, if you wanted to have access to current, quality information generated by intelligent people, and you wanted to be able to discuss that information, and your ideas about that information, with other intelligent people, you had to have access to the university. And your access was based on whether the people controlling the university thought you should have it — period. Those circumstances have eroded tremendously in recent years.

Before the internet, scientific theorizing was something that could be practiced only by working scientists, who directly gathered data through experiments, then shared their results with a tight-nit group of self-reinforcing, like-minded, working scientists. In theory, technical science papers were open to everyone, but in practice most people would have had to go to a lot of trouble to access them, and then would have no way to discuss what they had read with the rest of humanity. Today’s internet has ended that situation.

Similar to science, journalism was practiced only by a mutually reinforcing network of like-minded reporters, who could easily, and without directly lying, spin or selectively report the stories to create the vision of the world as they and their ilk preferred that it be seen. Again, today’s internet has rendered that practice mostly ineffective.

Newspapers have declined badly in recent years, and are now trying to move to the web, because people are reading their news off of that web. The major papers of yesteryear now try to make money from a subscription pay-wall, but it doesn’t work so well — people just go somewhere else. It turns out that, no, you didn’t need a bunch of super high quality writers to report that a plane has just slammed into a building. You just needed reasonably competent people writing it, and that’s practically free. When there’s open competition for that, when there isn’t this good-ol’-boys network controlling it, then — boom — suddenly it turns out, it’s free. There’s no significant monetary value in it because lots of people want to do it for nothing. And some of them are pretty good. (Note that this phenomenon of free, intelligent contribution is the entire basis of Wikipedia.)

The old way that journalism worked was that a full-time reporter would investigate the heck out of an issue, then report on it. He could charge significantly for his work, and he could spin it the way he wanted, or even scrap the whole article if he didn’t like what he had found. The new, modern way of journalism is this: Lots of people gather information and it spreads throughout the internet rapidly. Anyone is free to write about what it means. The end. This is very similar to what has happened to science — there is no longer a priesthood with membership control and an enforcible orthodoxy.

Coffee and Coolness

Until the past couple decades, coffee shop patronage was a relatively elite phenomenon. Some of the individuals who frequented these shops considered themselves a special breed; cool in a way the rest of the population was not. But Starbucks, and a few other big chains such as Panera and Caribou, have distilled this coffee-shop coolness into a mass-producible package and spread it all over the country in great quantity and with great popularity. Some coffee shop patrons detest this development, and shun Starbucks as a sell-out to the masses. (I’m writing a little book* about that; wish me luck getting it published!) The people who patronize Starbucks are generally just as cool as the people who patronized the pre-Starbucks coffee shops. The exclusivity of those pre-Starbucks coffee shops was based on convience of access — if a cool coffee shop was conveniently located, you could frequent it. Otherwise you almost never could. Starbucks has made the cool coffee shop accessible — to the dismay of those who thought they were something special because they had special access.


The world of these elites is now gone. Any person of average means in a developed part of the world has access to computers, and to instantly disseminated information about any subject via the internet. Absurd theories are exposed. Bright new theories are allowed to blossom instead of being squelched as disruptive. Scientific data is available to be interpreted by anyone who takes the time to read about it and contemplate what it might mean. Professional journalists can’t spin or selectively report without being quickly exposed as distorters of information. Anyone can publish apps, music, and books to a wide audience, selling nearly directly to the consumer; with a minimum of fuss inbetween. And the rich aroma of dark-roast coffee beans in a chic, laid-back atmosphere is just around the corner.


The most advanced personal conveniences and medical technologies are now mass-marketed to the general public at a price the average person can easily afford. Do rich people have a vastly better iPhone than the rest of us? Not at all. Do they have a substantially better chance of beating cancer at their local cancer hospital? Probably not. Do their TVs have a much crisper, higher-frame-rate picture than the average HDTV owner? No. Do they have access to a world of music, movies, and TV shows that the bulk of the population never gets to see or hear? Again, no. Modern technology has turned our society, in the words of Dinesh D’Souza, into one of “mass affluence.” The difference between rich and average has become vastly less than it once was.

The Remaining Elites

But there is one way that the wealthy still (and probably always will) get to enjoy their elite status: Space and time. The wealthy can afford much larger houses (plus boats), and they have their time — i.e. they don’t have to spend most of the day, most days of most weeks, doing drudge work that no one would touch who didn’t need a paycheck. They can travel more and enjoy life more. They may still work, but they work on things they want to work on, things they really care about. And if on any given day they don’t know what those things are? Then they have all day to find out.

And there’s another form of elitism that will persist in the face of technology: fame by exceptional action. Those who perform any action (creative, destructive, or just downright interesting) that stands out against the background of the general population, will always enjoy elite status. If only for fifteen minutes.


See also: The End of the Nerds


*Actually a cartoon parody book that touches on the subject of coffee and elitism; not really a book about that subject.


prev     next



Hear, hear

prev     next

Best Recent Articles

Method of Implementing A Secure Backdoor In Mobile Devices

When Starting A Game of Chicken With Apple, Expect To Lose

How I Clip My Cat’s Nails

Seasons By Temperature, Not Solstice

It’s Not A Criticism, It’s A Fact

Features (Regularly Updated)

A Memory of Gateway — news chronology of Apple’s ascendancy to the top of the technology mountain.

iPhone Party-Poopers Redux and Silly iPad Spoilsports — amusing litanies of industry pundits desperately hoping iPhone and iPad will go away and die.

Embittered Anti-Apple Belligerents — general anger at Apple’s gi-normous success.


My books

Now available on the iBookstore!



Daring Fireball

The Loop



Red Meat

Despair, Inc.

Real Solution #9 (Mambo Mania Mix) over stock nuke tests. (OK, somebody made them rip out the music — try this instead.)

Ernie & Bert In Casino

Great Explanation of Star Wars

Best commercials (IMO) from Superbowl 41, 43, 45, 46, and 47

Kirk & Spock get Closer

American football explained.

TV: Better Call Saul; Homeland; Survivor; The Jinx; Breaking Bad; Inside Amy Schumer

God’s kitchen

Celebrity Death Beeper — news you can use.

Making things for the web.

My vote for best commercial ever. (But this one’s a close second, and I love this one too.)

Recent commercials I admire: KFC, Audi

Best reggae song I’ve discovered in quite a while: Virgin Islands Nice

Pinball Arcade: Unbelievably accurate simulation of classic pinball machines from the late ’70s through the ’90s, with new ones added periodically. Like MAME for pinball — maybe better.

d120 dice: You too (like me) can be the ultimate dice nerd.

WiFi problems? I didn’t know just how bad my WiFi was until I got eero.

Favorite local pad thai: Pho Asian Noodle on Lane Ave. Yes, that place; blame Taco Bell for the amenities. Use the lime, chopsticks, and sriracha. Yummm.

Um, could there something wrong with me if I like this? Or this?

This entire site as a zip file — last updated 2018.02.01

Previous articles

Nothing More Angry Than A Cornered Anti-Apple

Let ’Em Glow

The Ultimate, Simple, Fair Tax

Compassion and Vision

When Starting A Game of Chicken With Apple, Expect To Lose

The Caveat

Superb Owl


Basic Reproduction Number

iBook Price-Fixing Lawsuit Redux — Apple Won

Delusion Made By Google

Religion Is A Wall

It’s Not A Criticism, It’s A Fact

Michigan Wolverines 2014 Football Season In Review

Sprinkler Shopping

Why There’s No MagSafe On the New Mac­Book

Sundar Pichai Says Devices Will Fade Away

The Question Every Ap­ple Naysayer Must An­swer

Apple’s Move To TSMC Is Fine For Apple, Bad For Samsung

Method of Implementing A Secure Backdoor In Mobile Devices

How I Clip My Cat’s Nails

Die Trying

Merger Hindsight

Human Life Decades

Fire and the Wheel — Not Good Examples of A Broken Patent System

Nobody Wants Public Transportation

Seasons By Temperature, Not Solstice

Ode To Coffee

Starting Over

FaceBook Messenger — Why I Don’t Use It

Happy Birthday, Anton Leeuwenhoek

Standard Deviation De­fined

Not Hypocrisy

Simple Guide To Pro­gress Bar Correctness

A Secure Backdoor Is Feasible

Don’t Blink

Predictive Value

Answering the Toughest Question About Disruption Theory

SSD TRIM Command In A Nutshell

The Enderle Grope

Aha! A New Way To Screw Apple

Champagne, By Any Other Maker

iOS Jailbreaking — A Perhaps-Biased Assessment

Embittered Anti-Apple Belligerents

Before 2001, After 2001

What A Difference Six Years Doesn’t Make

Stupefying New Year’s Stupidity

The Innovator’s Victory

The Cult of Free

Fitness — The Ultimate Transparency

Millions of Strange Dev­o­tees and Fanatics

Remember the iPod Killers?

Theory As Simulation

Four Analysts

What Was Christensen Thinking?

The Grass Is Always Greener — Viewing An­gle

Is Using Your Own Pat­ent Still Allowed?

The Upside-Down Tech Future

Motive of the Anti-Ap­ple Pundit

Cheating Like A Human

Disremembering Mi­cro­soft

Security-Through-Obscurity Redux — The Best of Both Worlds

iPhone 2013 Score Card

Dominant and Recessive Traits, Demystified

Yes, You Do Have To Be the Best

The United States of Texas

Vertical Disintegration

He’s No Jobs — Fire Him

A Players

McEnroe, Not Borg, Had Class

Conflict Fades Away

Four-Color Theorem A­nal­y­sis — Rules To Limit the Problem

The Unusual Mo­nop­o­list

Reasonable Projection

Five Times What They Paid For It

Bypassable Security Certificates Are Useless

I’d Give My Right Arm To Go To Mars

Free Advice About Apple’s iOS App Store Guidelines

Inciting Violence

One Platform

Understanding IDC’s Tablet Market Share Graph

I Vote Socialist Be­cause...

That Person

Product Naming — Google Is the Other Microsoft

Antecessor Hypotheticum

Apple Paves the Way For Apple

Why — A Poem

App Anger — the Supersized-Mastodon-In-the-Room That Marco Arment Doesn’t See

Apple’s Graphic Failure

Why Microsoft Copies Apple (and Google)

Coders Code, Bosses Boss

Droidfood For Thought

Investment Is Not A Sure Thing

Exercise is Two Thirds of Everything

Dan “Real Enderle” Ly­ons


Ignoring the iPod touch

Manual Intervention Should Never Make A Computer Faster

Predictions ’13


Zeroth — Why the Century Number Is One More Than the Year Number

Longer Than It Seems

Partners: Believe In Ap­ple

Gun Control: Best Ar­gu­ments

John C. Dvorak — Translation To English

Destructive Youth

Wiens’s Whine

Free Will — The Grand Equivocation

What Windows-vs.-Mac Actually Proved

A Tale of Two Logos

Microsoft’s Three Paths

Amazon Won’t Be A Big Winner In the DOJ’s Price-Fixing Suit

Infinite Sets, Infinite Authority

Strategy Analytics and Long Term Ac­count­a­bil­i­ty

The Third Stage of Computing

Why 1 Isn’t Prime, 2 Is Prime, and 2 Is the Only Even Prime

Readability BS

Lie Detection and Psy­chos



Microsoft’s Dim Pros­pects

Humanity — Just Barely

Hanke-Henry Calendar Won’t Be Adopted

Collatz Conjecture A­nal­y­sis (But No Proof; Sorry)

Rock-Solid iOS App Stability

Microsoft’s Uncreative Character

Microsoft’s Alternate Reality Bubble

Microsoft’s Three Ruts

Society’s Fascination With Mass Murder

PlaysForSure and Wikipedia — Revisionism At Its Finest


Patent Reform?

How Many Licks

Microsoft’s Incredible Run

Voting Socialist

Darwin Saves

The Size of Things In the Universe

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy That Wasn’t


Nobody Was In Love With Windows

Apples To Apples — How Anti-Apple Pundits Shoot Themselves In the Foot

No Holds Barred

Betting Against Hu­man­i­ty

Apple’s Premium Features Are Free

Why So Many Computer Guys Hate Apple

3D TV With No Glasses and No Parallax/Focus Issues

Waves With Particle-Like Properties

Gridlock Is Just Fine

Sex Is A Fantasy

Major Player

Why the iPad Wannabes Will Definitely Flop

Predators and Parasites

Prison Is For Lotto Losers

The False Dichotomy

Wait and See — Windows-vs-Mac Will Repeat Itself

Dishonesty For the Greater Good

Barr Part 2

Enough Information

Zune Is For Apple Haters

Good Open, Bad Open

Beach Bodies — Who’s Really Shallow?

Upgrade? Maybe Not

Eliminating the Im­pos­si­ble

Selfish Desires

Farewell, Pirate Cachet

The Two Risk-Takers

Number of Companies — the Idiocy That Never Dies

Holding On To the Solution

Apple Religion

Long-Term Planning

What You Have To Give Up

The End of Elitism

Good and Evil


How Religion Distorts Science

Laziness and Creativity

Sideloading and the Supersized-Mastodon-In-the-Room That Snell Doesn’t See

Long-Term Self-De­lu­sion

App Store Success Won’t Translate To Books, Movies, and Shows

Silly iPad Spoilsports

I Disagree

Five Rational Coun­ter­ar­gu­ments

Majority Report

Simply Unjust

Zooman Science

Reaganomics — Like A Diet — Works

Free R&D?

Apple’s On the Right Track

Mountains of Evidence

What We Do

Hope Conquers All

Humans Are Special — Just Not That Special

Life = Survival of the Fittest

Excuse Me, We’re Going To Build On Your Property

No Trademark iWorries


Twisted Excuses

The Fall of Google

Real Painters

The Meaning of Kicking Ass

How To Really Stop Casual Movie Disc Ripping

The Solitary Path of the High-Talent Pro­gram­mer

Fixing, Not Preaching

Why Blackmail Is Still Illegal

Designers Cannot Do Anything Imaginable

Wise Dr. Drew

Rats In A Too-Small Cage

Coming To Reason

Everything Isn’t Moving To the Web

Pragmatics, Not Rights

Grey Zone

Methodologically Dogmatic

The Purpose of Lan­guage

The Punishment Defines the Crime

Two Many Cooks


One Last Splurge

Making Money

What Heaven and Hell Are Really About

America — The Last Suburb


What the Cloud Isn’t For

Diminishing Returns

What You’re Seeing

What My Life Needs To Be

Taking An Early Re­tire­ment

Office Buildings

A, B, C, D, Pointless Relativity

Stephen Meyer and Michael Medved — Where Is ID Going?

If You Didn’t Vote — Complain Away

iPhone Party-Poopers Redux

What Free Will Is Really About

Spectacularly Well

Pointless Wrappers

PTED — The P Is Silent

Out of Sync

Stupid Stickers

Security Through Nor­mal­cy

The Case For Corporate Bonuses

Movie Copyrights Are Forever

Permitted By Whom?

Quantum Cognition and Other Hogwash

The Problem With Message Theory

Bell’s Boring Inequality and the Insanity of the Gaps

Paying the Rent At the 6 Park Avenue A­part­ments

Primary + Reviewer — An Alternative IT Plan For Corporations

Yes Yes Yes


Hey Hey Whine Whine

Microsoft About Microsoft Visual Microsoft Studio Microsoft

Hidden Purple Tiger

Forest Fair Mall and the Second Lamborghini

Intelligent Design — The Straight Dope

Maxwell’s Demon — Three Real-World Ex­am­ples


Entitlement BS



Einstein’s Error — The Confusion of Laws With Their Effects

The Museum Is the Art

Polly Sooth the Air Rage

The Truth

The Darkness

Morality = STDs?

Fulfilling the Moral Du­ty To Disdain



Real Design

The Two Rules of Great Programming


The End of the Nerds

Poverty — Humanity’s Damage Control

Berners-Lee’s Rating System = Google

The Secret Anti-MP3 Trick In “Independent Women” and “You Sang To Me”

ID and the Large Had­ron Collider Scare

Not A Bluff

The Fall of Microsoft

Life Sucks When You’re Not Winning


The Old-Fashioned Way

The Old People Who Pop Into Existence

Theodicy — A Big Stack of Papers

The Designed, Cause-and-Effect Brain


IC Counterarguments

The Capitalist’s Imaginary Line

Education Isn’t Eve­ry­thing

I Don’t Know

Funny iPhone Party-Poopers

Avoiding Conflict At All Costs

Behavior and Free Will, Unconfused

“Reduced To” Ab­sur­dum

Suzie and Bubba Redneck — the Carriers of Intelligence

Everything You Need To Know About Haldane’s Dilemma

Darwin + Hitler = Ba­lo­ney


Designed For Combat

Speed Racer R Us

Bold — Uh-huh

Conscious of Con­scious­ness

Future Perfect

Where Real and Yahoo Went Wrong

The Purpose of Surface

Eradicating Religion Won’t Eradicate War

Documentation Overkill

A Tale of Two Movies

The Changing Face of Sam Adams

Dinesh D’Souza On ID

Why Quintic (and Higher) Polynomials Have No Algebraic Solution

Translation of Paul Graham’s Footnote To Plain English

What Happened To Moore’s Law?

Goldston On ID

The End of Martial Law

The Two Faces of Ev­o­lu­tion

A Fine Rec­om­men­da­tion

Free Will and Population Statistics

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — D’Souza

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — Dennett

The Non-Euclidean Ge­om­e­try That Wasn’t There

Defective Attitude Towards Suburbia

The Twin Deficit Phan­toms

Sleep Sync and Vertical Hold

More FUD In Your Eye

The Myth of Rub­ber­neck­ing

Keeping Intelligent Design Honest

Failure of the Amiga — Not Just Mis­man­age­ment

Maxwell’s Silver Hammer = Be My Honey Do?

End Unsecured Debt

The Digits of Pi Cannot Be Sequentially Generated By A Computer Program

Faster Is Better

Goals Can’t Be Avoided

Propped-Up Products

Ignoring ID Won’t Work

The Crabs and the Bucket

Communism As A Side Effect of the Transition To Capitalism

Google and Wikipedia, Revisited

National Geographic’s Obesity BS


Theodicy Is For Losers

Seattle Redux


Living Well

A Memory of Gateway

Is Apple’s Font Rendering Really Non-Pixel-Aware?

Humans Are Complexity, Not Choice

A Subtle Shift

Moralism — The Emperor’s New Success

Code Is Our Friend

The Edge of Religion

The Dark Side of Pixel-Aware Font Rendering

The Futility of DVD En­cryp­tion

ID Isn’t About Size or Speed

Blood-Curdling Screams

ID Venn Diagram

Rich and Good-Looking? Why Libertarianism Goes Nowhere

FUV — Fear, Uncertainty, and Vista

Malware Isn’t About Total Control

Howard = Second Com­ing?

Doomsday? Or Just Another Sunday

The Real Function of Wikipedia In A Google World

Objective-C Philosophy

Clarity From Cisco

2007 Macworld Keynote Prediction

FUZ — Fear, Uncertainty, and Zune

No Fear — The Most Important Thing About Intelligent Design

How About A Rational Theodicy

Napster and the Subscription Model

Intelligent Design — Introduction

The One Feature I Want To See In Apple’s Safari.