Darel Rex Finley in 888

Number of Companies — the Idiocy That Never Dies

2010.08.27   prev     next

EVER since about 2004, there’s been this thread of punditry that keeps popping back up every year or two, saying that Apple is making the same mistake it made in the 1980s against Windows, and will soon (or eventually) suffer the same niche-ization that the original Mac did then. This argument is flawed for a number of reasons that have been gone over plenty of times before, so here I want to address a new one that I think hasn’t been as noticed.

Soldiers On the Battlefield

Imagine that you’re a soldier with a sword, out on a perpetual battlefield. Many other soldiers are wandering around the battlefield too. There’s nothing much to do on this battlefield except try and kill other soldiers, but you can always team up with some of them for safety; for strength in numbers.

If you team up with a large number of other soldiers, what will happen? You will easily trounce your enemies due to overwhelming force. If you refuse to team up with most other soldiers, and mostly go it alone, or with just a few, tenuous partnerships, what will happen? You soon will be killed by a mob of allied soldiers against which you don’t have a chance.

This analogy, or something very much like it, apparently is what most Apple-is-soon-doomed pundits have in mind when they suggest that the number of companies lining up behind system XYZ is a strong indicator of how successful XYZ will be, and how hard it will be to compete against XYZ. And it’s apparently what they’re thinking when they describe Steve Jobs as “sitting alone” in a “walled garden” (App Store) while everyone else is gathering and interacting in the open park (Android).

Of course, we know something must be wrong with this analogy, because PlaysForSure and Windows Mobile both tanked, and both of them should have handily beaten away all competition if the analogy was correct. And the iPhone and its App Store are both going like gangbusters. So what’s wrong with the soldier analogy?

The Flaw

Although some soldiers are bigger and stronger than others, and some are more skilled fighters than others, the difference isn’t particularly extreme, so even an unusually large, strong, and skilled soldier can be easily overpowered by a group of several soldiers bent on his destruction. But with companies, that is not true. A single company can be thousands of times as successful as another, so even a band of twenty companies acting in cooperation to take down a single company may be unsuccessful if that single company is much more successful than the twenty of them combined. Further, a company can play on multiple, separate battlefields (markets). A company that is relatively unsuccessful on one battlefield may be hugely successful on another.

This is why the many participants in PlaysForSure, some of them big, successful companies in their own right, didn’t make a dent in iPod: The combined lot of them, on the portable digital music player battlefield, were still tiny compared to Apple’s huge presence there.

Adding more companies to the PlaysForSure mix did not make it harder for Apple to compete against PlaysForSure, because none of those companies was bringing anything particularly special to the game. Each PlaysForSure partner was doing about the same thing as every other PlaysForSure partner: just making another model of PlaysForSure music player or another PlaysForSure online store. None of them was better than what Apple was already dominating the market with, so the consumer had no reason to switch to PlaysForSure. Throw together ten companies each with a ho-hum product, and what do you get — an excellent product? No, you get ten ho-hum products.

Competing With? Huh?

This lunacy — that Apple will have a harder time the more individual companies it competes with — recently has been taken to a new level in a Business Insider article in which Fabrice Grinda suggests that since Apple is now making its own processor (the A4 chip), “it now has to compete with the likes of ARM!” Which, according to Grinda, can only make Apple’s task of thriving that much harder.

Let’s stop for a second and take note of a few poignant facts:

  1. Apple hasn’t entered the processor market. Apple isn’t selling the A4 chip. The A4 is made strictly for use in Apple’s own mobile products.

  2. ARM hasn’t entered the mobile phone or tablet markets. ARM is simply selling ARM processors to whomever will buy.

  3. If, a few years from now, Apple were to find that the latest chips from ARM are significantly better than its own latest A4 (or whatever), then Apple could simply buy chips from ARM — which ARM would be only too happy to sell.

So Apple’s creation and use of its own A4 chip doesn’t put Apple under any new competitive pressure at all. It helps Apple to succeed against those it already competes against, by allowing it to custom-design its processor to best meet the needs of its not-yet-released products — instead of having to choose from whatever chips are being offered by ARM and the other chip sellers. And since the A4 is owned by Apple, whatever competitive advantages it offers are available only to Apple.

It’s a bit flabbergasting that Grinda, a summa cum laude Princeton grad, doesn’t seem to see this. Does Princeton, perhaps, award egregia cum laude to those who can perceive the difference between making chips to sell, versus making them for use only in your own products?

 

Update 2010.10.09 — More of the same baffling bullshit, this time from Charles Arthur in the Guardian:

Given the number of companies that are announcing tablets, one of two things will happen; the market will absolutely explode, and everyone and their dog will have a tablet in a couple of years [...] or it will be another brief flurry, rather like netbooks are turning into, which will in turn mean swathes of red ink.

I suspect that for Apple to do well [with] iPads, it actually needs those competitors to do well too. There’s nothing worse for a company than to try to create a market, only to find yourself the only one in it. [...] With tablets, if everyone decides that all the competition is rubbish, Apple will be left alone, standing in the middle of a blasted heath, master of all it surveys ... which won’t be much.

Nothing worse than being the only, lonely company selling a couple million tablets a month, huh? Somebody, please notify Princeton that they need to award this man an honorary summa cum laude.

 

Update 2010.10.14 — The Mac Observer? ’Fraid so; here’s John Martellaro:

Apple is great at creating great products that we love. To keep doing that, Apple has to maintain control. That’s in conflict with the business forces that always apply. Products, like Android, that allow companies to jump in, rather than toil over their own innovation, will always be in demand. ... There will always be industry forces that want Apple to fail, lest they look bad and get squeezed out of the game. ... Android lets companies look cool, make products that look like the Apple iPhone, and lets everyone take a shot at a cut of the smartphone pie. It’s exactly what the industry craved, and it’s everything Apple isn’t.

So if a big bunch of Apple competitors just jump in, wanting, demanding, and craving Apple’s failure — Apple will fail! Room for one more, Princeton?

 

Update 2011.01.15 — Dan “Fake Steve” Lyons in Newsweek:

[Android] has become an unstoppable juggernaut. ... Android still has one huge advantage over the iPhone — diversity.

...

No matter how many carriers sign on to carry the iPhone, in the long run, Apple has again set itself up to be a niche player in smartphones, just as it is in PCs.

No matter how many carriers? What? Apple just signed up a single carrier. A huge one. And the only other two US carriers it conceivably could sign up now are Sprint and T-Mobile, which as far as I know wouldn’t matter as much as Verizon if you put the two of them together.

Which is better, Dan — a dozen quarters, or a single $50 bill? You figure it out.

 

Update 2011.02.04 — One I missed from last month, Katherine Noyes in PCWorld:

[U]nless Apple starts licensing the iPhone to other handset makers, the platform could get lost amid the many Android competitors.

Because what consumers really crave in a mobile software platform is a hundred different manufacturers, each trying to put their own spin on how it should work. Consumers just love that. And when they want to buy a smartphone, they typically write down the names of all the different models of smartphones on little slips of paper, shake them all up in a hat, reach in and pull one out! And then Apple gets, like, 1% of purchases. Bye-bye, Apple.

 

Update 2011.03.19 — And how could I pass up this one from last June, Dennis Kneale on The Daily Beast:

In less than a year, Android has lured over two dozen makers to join its loosey-goosey confederacy, and now they make 50 rival handsets. Apple goes it alone and makes, basically, one model. Android’s inexorable advance is only a matter of time.

Because two dozen companies always beat one company. Got it.

Google, its founders, and its CEO, Eric Schmidt, stand for the cause of open design. Thousands of developers from hundreds of shops and dozens of device makers are free to tinker with Android all they want.

Wait — did you say thousands of developers are “free to tinker with Android all they want?” Or thousands of developers are writing great apps that run on most, if not all, Android phones? Not sure I heard you. Clarification needed.

 

Update 2012.02.14 — Here’s another perfect example of this absurd illogic, from Neil Trevett of Nvidia:

Apple is fabulously successful and I’m sure will continue to be so, but I do think Android will, over time, really dominate the mobile market. It’s nothing to do with who’s better, it’s just you have thousands of companies producing these devices... I think it’s going to be a repeat of the PC/Mac market, with 80% Android and 20% iOS.

Of course it is. How could it be otherwise.

 

Update 2012.03.22Nicholas Kolakowski on eWEEK last November:

“Microsoft’s Windows 8 Tablets Not Too Late”

“Is it truly too late for Windows 8 tablets? The question seems asinine, considering how said tablets won’t hit the market for several quarters.”

“But does that necessarily mean that Windows 8 tablets will arrive on store shelves too late for consumers? No. In the tablet wars, Microsoft has one very powerful tool at its disposal: its wide variety of manufacturing partners. ... OEMs in the tablet and PC arena will have little choice but to embrace Windows 8 as the route forward against Apple’s iPad.”

It’s not too late — to make a bunch of tablets that don’t sell.

 

Update 2014.06.05John Fontana in ZDNet:

“Apple’s fingerprint reader missing one special touch”

“Apple is still without one important piece that would position its iPhone as a strong authentication device for secure access to both consumer and enterprise Web applications. ... That piece? The inclusion of FIDO Alliance protocols, which provide a standard infrastructure for multi-factor authentication and align with an emerging federated identity architecture for the Web. FIDO adoption would allow Apple to come out and play — and authenticate — with the rest of the world’s services, apps and wearables that live beyond the App Store.”

“[FIDO] should sound a bit like the Touch ID plans Apple announced this week, only Apple’s version is walled off in its locked Apple garden.”

“‘The guys who built the (AuthenTec) sensors [now owned by Apple] were thinking along these lines,’ said Michael Barrett, president of the FIDO Alliance. And that connection gives Barrett confidence that he will one day see Apple in the FIDO fold.”

“‘Obviously Apple has a nice market penetration, but it doesn’t own the handset market and it doesn’t own the mobile market,’ said Barrett.”

“Samsung users are already there. As are FIDO board-level members including Bank of America, Discover, Google, Microsoft, MasterCard, and Nok Nok Labs along with another 100 engaged members.”

A hundred companies that don’t make the iPhone. Or the iPad. Or the iPod touch. Or the iOS App Store. Or the Apple Watch. Or Apple TV. Or iCloud. Or the Mac. Or iTunes. Or Apple Retail. Or Apple Pay. But a hundred companies always beat one company — everybody knows that.

 

Update 2014.04.09 — Apple appears to be forming a team to create its own baseband chips, presumably for its own, future products. Maybe Grinda could grace us with a new article, saying that Apple’s job just got even harder because now they have to compete with the likes of Qualcomm.

 

Update 2014.10.28Matthew Mombrea in IT World, making the same mistake all over again:

“Why CurrentC will beat out Apple Pay in the end

Apple pay was released to the public just over a week ago and it’s stumbling out of the gate. ... retailer participation is low. ... Unfortunately the payment system may be doomed to fail.”

“The strength of the merchants designing or backing CurrentC is enormous. It reads like a greatest hits list of retail outfits ...”

“The retailers have joined together to create a platform that is independent of the credit card companies and their profit-robbing transaction fees. ... This is huge for the merchants who are losing a significant amount of money on every credit card transaction.”

Which is destined to be successful: Several companies offering something that consumers really don’t want? Or one company offering something they do?

 

prev     next

 

 

Hear, hear

prev     next

Best Recent Articles

Method of Implementing A Secure Backdoor In Mobile Devices

When Starting A Game of Chicken With Apple, Expect To Lose

How I Clip My Cat’s Nails

Seasons By Temperature, Not Solstice

It’s Not A Criticism, It’s A Fact

Features (Regularly Updated)

A Memory of Gateway — news chronology of Apple’s ascendancy to the top of the technology mountain.

iPhone Party-Poopers Redux and Silly iPad Spoilsports — amusing litanies of industry pundits desperately hoping the iPhone and iPad will go away and die.

Embittered Anti-Apple Belligerents — general anger at Apple’s gi-normous success.

RSS FEED

My books

Now available on the iBookstore!

   

Links

Daring Fireball

The Loop

RoughlyDrafted

Macalope

Red Meat

Despair, Inc.

Real Solution #9 (Mambo Mania Mix) over stock nuke tests. (OK, somebody made them rip out the music — try this instead.)

Ernie & Bert In Casino

Great Explanation of Star Wars

Best commercials (IMO) from Superbowl 41, 43, 45, 46, and 47

Kirk & Spock get Closer

American football explained.

Sonos and Opalum — awesome sound stuff I saw at CEDIA.

TV: Better Call Saul; Homeland; Survivor; The Jinx; Breaking Bad; House of Cards; Inside Amy Schumer

God’s kitchen

Celebrity Death Beeper — news you can use.

Making things for the web.

My vote for best commercial ever. (But this one’s a close second, and I love this one too.)

Recent commercials I admire: KFC, Audi

Best reggae song I’ve discovered in quite a while: Virgin Islands Nice

Pinball Arcade: Unbelievably accurate simulation of classic pinball machines from the late ’70s through the ’90s, with new ones added periodically. Like MAME for pinball — maybe better.

d120 dice: You too (like me) can be the ultimate dice nerd.

WiFi problems? I didn’t know just how bad my WiFi was until I got eero.

Favorite local pad thai: Pho Asian Noodle on Lane Ave. Yes, that place; blame Taco Bell for the amenities. Use the lime, chopsticks, and sriracha. Yummm.

Um, could there something wrong with me if I like this? Or this?

This entire site as a zip file — last updated 2017.11.02

Previous articles

The Ultimate, Simple, Fair Tax

Compassion and Vision

When Starting A Game of Chicken With Apple, Expect To Lose

The Caveat

Superb Owl

NavStar

Basic Reproduction Number

iBook Price-Fixing Lawsuit Redux — Apple Won

Delusion Made By Google

Religion Is A Wall

It’s Not A Criticism, It’s A Fact

Michigan Wolverines 2014 Football Season In Review

Why There’s No MagSafe On the New Mac­Book

Sundar Pichai Says Devices Will Fade Away

The Question Every Ap­ple Naysayer Must An­swer

Apple’s Move To TSMC Is Fine For Apple, Bad For Samsung

Method of Implementing A Secure Backdoor In Mobile Devices

How I Clip My Cat’s Nails

Die Trying

Merger Hindsight

Human Life Decades

Fire and the Wheel — Not Good Examples of A Broken Patent System

Nobody Wants Public Transportation

Seasons By Temperature, Not Solstice

Ode To Coffee

Starting Over

FaceBook Messenger — Why I Don’t Use It

Happy Birthday, Anton Leeuwenhoek

Standard Deviation De­fined

Not Hypocrisy

Simple Guide To Pro­gress Bar Correctness

A Secure Backdoor Is Feasible

Don’t Blink

Predictive Value

Answering the Toughest Question About Disruption Theory

SSD TRIM Command In A Nutshell

The Enderle Grope

Aha! A New Way To Screw Apple

Champagne, By Any Other Maker

iOS Jailbreaking — A Perhaps-Biased Assessment

Embittered Anti-Apple Belligerents

Before 2001, After 2001

What A Difference Six Years Doesn’t Make

Stupefying New Year’s Stupidity

The Innovator’s Victory

The Cult of Free

Fitness — The Ultimate Transparency

Millions of Strange Dev­o­tees and Fanatics

Remember the iPod Killers?

Theory As Simulation

Four Analysts

What Was Christensen Thinking?

The Grass Is Always Greener — Viewing An­gle

Is Using Your Own Pat­ent Still Allowed?

The Upside-Down Tech Future

Motive of the Anti-Ap­ple Pundit

Cheating Like A Human

Disremembering Mi­cro­soft

Security-Through-Obscurity Redux — The Best of Both Worlds

iPhone 2013 Score Card

Dominant and Recessive Traits, Demystified

Yes, You Do Have To Be the Best

The United States of Texas

Vertical Disintegration

He’s No Jobs — Fire Him

A Players

McEnroe, Not Borg, Had Class

Conflict Fades Away

Four-Color Theorem A­nal­y­sis — Rules To Limit the Problem

The Unusual Mo­nop­o­list

Reasonable Projection

Five Times What They Paid For It

Bypassable Security Certificates Are Useless

I’d Give My Right Arm To Go To Mars

Free Advice About Apple’s iOS App Store Guidelines

Inciting Violence

One Platform

Understanding IDC’s Tablet Market Share Graph

I Vote Socialist Be­cause...

That Person

Product Naming — Google Is the Other Microsoft

Antecessor Hypotheticum

Apple Paves the Way For Apple

Why — A Poem

App Anger — the Supersized-Mastodon-In-the-Room That Marco Arment Doesn’t See

Apple’s Graphic Failure

Why Microsoft Copies Apple (and Google)

Coders Code, Bosses Boss

Droidfood For Thought

Investment Is Not A Sure Thing

Exercise is Two Thirds of Everything

Dan “Real Enderle” Ly­ons

Fairness

Ignoring the iPod touch

Manual Intervention Should Never Make A Computer Faster

Predictions ’13

Paperless

Zeroth — Why the Century Number Is One More Than the Year Number

Longer Than It Seems

Partners: Believe In Ap­ple

Gun Control: Best Ar­gu­ments

John C. Dvorak — Translation To English

Destructive Youth

Wiens’s Whine

Free Will — The Grand Equivocation

What Windows-vs.-Mac Actually Proved

A Tale of Two Logos

Microsoft’s Three Paths

Amazon Won’t Be A Big Winner In the DOJ’s Price-Fixing Suit

Infinite Sets, Infinite Authority

Strategy Analytics and Long Term Ac­count­a­bil­i­ty

The Third Stage of Computing

Why 1 Isn’t Prime, 2 Is Prime, and 2 Is the Only Even Prime

Readability BS

Lie Detection and Psy­chos

Liking

Steps

Microsoft’s Dim Pros­pects

Humanity — Just Barely

Hanke-Henry Calendar Won’t Be Adopted

Collatz Conjecture A­nal­y­sis (But No Proof; Sorry)

Rock-Solid iOS App Stability

Microsoft’s Uncreative Character

Microsoft’s Alternate Reality Bubble

Microsoft’s Three Ruts

Society’s Fascination With Mass Murder

PlaysForSure and Wikipedia — Revisionism At Its Finest

Procrastination

Patent Reform?

How Many Licks

Microsoft’s Incredible Run

Voting Socialist

Darwin Saves

The Size of Things In the Universe

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy That Wasn’t

Fun

Nobody Was In Love With Windows

Apples To Apples — How Anti-Apple Pundits Shoot Themselves In the Foot

No Holds Barred

Betting Against Hu­man­i­ty

Apple’s Premium Features Are Free

Why So Many Computer Guys Hate Apple

3D TV With No Glasses and No Parallax/Focus Issues

Waves With Particle-Like Properties

Gridlock Is Just Fine

Sex Is A Fantasy

Major Player

Why the iPad Wannabes Will Definitely Flop

Predators and Parasites

Prison Is For Lotto Losers

The False Dichotomy

Wait and See — Windows-vs-Mac Will Repeat Itself

Dishonesty For the Greater Good

Barr Part 2

Enough Information

Zune Is For Apple Haters

Good Open, Bad Open

Beach Bodies — Who’s Really Shallow?

Upgrade? Maybe Not

Eliminating the Im­pos­si­ble

Selfish Desires

Farewell, Pirate Cachet

The Two Risk-Takers

Number of Companies — the Idiocy That Never Dies

Holding On To the Solution

Apple Religion

Long-Term Planning

What You Have To Give Up

The End of Elitism

Good and Evil

Life

How Religion Distorts Science

Laziness and Creativity

Sideloading and the Supersized-Mastodon-In-the-Room That Snell Doesn’t See

Long-Term Self-De­lu­sion

App Store Success Won’t Translate To Books, Movies, and Shows

Silly iPad Spoilsports

I Disagree

Five Rational Coun­ter­ar­gu­ments

Majority Report

Simply Unjust

Zooman Science

Reaganomics — Like A Diet — Works

Free R&D?

Apple’s On the Right Track

Mountains of Evidence

What We Do

Hope Conquers All

Humans Are Special — Just Not That Special

Life = Survival of the Fittest

Excuse Me, We’re Going To Build On Your Property

No Trademark iWorries

Knowing

Twisted Excuses

The Fall of Google

Real Painters

The Meaning of Kicking Ass

How To Really Stop Casual Movie Disc Ripping

The Solitary Path of the High-Talent Pro­gram­mer

Fixing, Not Preaching

Why Blackmail Is Still Illegal

Designers Cannot Do Anything Imaginable

Wise Dr. Drew

Rats In A Too-Small Cage

Coming To Reason

Everything Isn’t Moving To the Web

Pragmatics, Not Rights

Grey Zone

Methodologically Dogmatic

The Purpose of Lan­guage

The Punishment Defines the Crime

Two Many Cooks

Pragmatism

One Last Splurge

Making Money

What Heaven and Hell Are Really About

America — The Last Suburb

Hoarding

What the Cloud Isn’t For

Diminishing Returns

What You’re Seeing

What My Life Needs To Be

Taking An Early Re­tire­ment

Office Buildings

A, B, C, D, Pointless Relativity

Stephen Meyer and Michael Medved — Where Is ID Going?

If You Didn’t Vote — Complain Away

iPhone Party-Poopers Redux

What Free Will Is Really About

Spectacularly Well

Pointless Wrappers

PTED — The P Is Silent

Out of Sync

Stupid Stickers

Security Through Nor­mal­cy

The Case For Corporate Bonuses

Movie Copyrights Are Forever

Permitted By Whom?

Quantum Cognition and Other Hogwash

The Problem With Message Theory

Bell’s Boring Inequality and the Insanity of the Gaps

Paying the Rent At the 6 Park Avenue A­part­ments

Primary + Reviewer — An Alternative IT Plan For Corporations

Yes Yes Yes

Feelings

Hey Hey Whine Whine

Microsoft About Microsoft Visual Microsoft Studio Microsoft

Hidden Purple Tiger

Forest Fair Mall and the Second Lamborghini

Intelligent Design — The Straight Dope

Maxwell’s Demon — Three Real-World Ex­am­ples

Zealots

Entitlement BS

Agenderle

Mutations

Einstein’s Error — The Confusion of Laws With Their Effects

The Museum Is the Art

Polly Sooth the Air Rage

The Truth

The Darkness

Morality = STDs?

Fulfilling the Moral Du­ty To Disdain

MustWinForSure

Choice

Real Design

The Two Rules of Great Programming

Cynicism

The End of the Nerds

Poverty — Humanity’s Damage Control

Berners-Lee’s Rating System = Google

The Secret Anti-MP3 Trick In “Independent Women” and “You Sang To Me”

ID and the Large Had­ron Collider Scare

Not A Bluff

The Fall of Microsoft

Life Sucks When You’re Not Winning

Aware

The Old-Fashioned Way

The Old People Who Pop Into Existence

Theodicy — A Big Stack of Papers

The Designed, Cause-and-Effect Brain

Mosaics

IC Counterarguments

The Capitalist’s Imaginary Line

Education Isn’t Eve­ry­thing

I Don’t Know

Funny iPhone Party-Poopers

Avoiding Conflict At All Costs

Behavior and Free Will, Unconfused

“Reduced To” Ab­sur­dum

Suzie and Bubba Redneck — the Carriers of Intelligence

Everything You Need To Know About Haldane’s Dilemma

Darwin + Hitler = Ba­lo­ney

Meta-ware

Designed For Combat

Speed Racer R Us

Bold — Uh-huh

Conscious of Con­scious­ness

Future Perfect

Where Real and Yahoo Went Wrong

The Purpose of Surface

Eradicating Religion Won’t Eradicate War

Documentation Overkill

A Tale of Two Movies

The Changing Face of Sam Adams

Dinesh D’Souza On ID

Why Quintic (and Higher) Polynomials Have No Algebraic Solution

Translation of Paul Graham’s Footnote To Plain English

What Happened To Moore’s Law?

Goldston On ID

The End of Martial Law

The Two Faces of Ev­o­lu­tion

A Fine Rec­om­men­da­tion

Free Will and Population Statistics

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — D’Souza

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — Dennett

The Non-Euclidean Ge­om­e­try That Wasn’t There

Defective Attitude Towards Suburbia

The Twin Deficit Phan­toms

Sleep Sync and Vertical Hold

More FUD In Your Eye

The Myth of Rub­ber­neck­ing

Keeping Intelligent Design Honest

Failure of the Amiga — Not Just Mis­man­age­ment

Maxwell’s Silver Hammer = Be My Honey Do?

End Unsecured Debt

The Digits of Pi Cannot Be Sequentially Generated By A Computer Program

Faster Is Better

Goals Can’t Be Avoided

Propped-Up Products

Ignoring ID Won’t Work

The Crabs and the Bucket

Communism As A Side Effect of the Transition To Capitalism

Google and Wikipedia, Revisited

National Geographic’s Obesity BS

Cavemen

Theodicy Is For Losers

Seattle Redux

Quitting

Living Well

A Memory of Gateway

Is Apple’s Font Rendering Really Non-Pixel-Aware?

Humans Are Complexity, Not Choice

A Subtle Shift

Moralism — The Emperor’s New Success

Code Is Our Friend

The Edge of Religion

The Dark Side of Pixel-Aware Font Rendering

The Futility of DVD En­cryp­tion

ID Isn’t About Size or Speed

Blood-Curdling Screams

ID Venn Diagram

Rich and Good-Looking? Why Libertarianism Goes Nowhere

FUV — Fear, Uncertainty, and Vista

Malware Isn’t About Total Control

Howard = Second Com­ing?

Doomsday? Or Just Another Sunday

The Real Function of Wikipedia In A Google World

Objective-C Philosophy

Clarity From Cisco

2007 Macworld Keynote Prediction

FUZ — Fear, Uncertainty, and Zune

No Fear — The Most Important Thing About Intelligent Design

How About A Rational Theodicy

Napster and the Subscription Model

Intelligent Design — Introduction

The One Feature I Want To See In Apple’s Safari.