Darel Rex Finley in PhotoBooth

Future Perfect

2008.05.11   prev     next

Back in the day, I used to be a regular viewer of “A Current Affair” (when there was such a thing — I hear it’s still going strong in Australia, but here in the USA it got beat out by Inside Edition and other tabloid news shows).

After a while, I noticed a curious pattern. Every day, at the end of the show, it presented previews of what was going to be on tomorrow’s show. And they always looked much more provocative and fascinating that what I just saw on today’s show. It took me many weeks before I one day realized — duh! — that it’s impossible for every show to be much better than the one before it. Obviously, the previews had to be seriously misleading.

David Letterman had a gag where, for many consecutive shows, he would tell the studio audience that they were great, but last night’s audience was horrible. It was, of course, the same principle at work.

Which brings us to Microsoft.

Microsoft (and before it, IBM in the 1960s, if the stories I’ve heard over the years are true), has developed a pattern of releasing mediocre products, but insisting that vastly better, blow-the-competition-away products are coming up in the next year or two. After many years of this, you’d think people would start realizing that that “great” product that Microsoft will be releasing twelve months from now may not be so great. And it may not be ready twelve months from now, either. Maybe people are starting to realize this; Apple’s seen some remarkable gains lately.

This is just another fundamental difference between Apple’s and Microsoft’s whole approach to business. While Microsoft is perpetually hyping next year’s “great” product, while hawking today’s let-down, welcome-to-reality product, Apple is perpetually releasing really great products, hyping those very same released products, and keeping as silent as possible about what’s coming out next year.

Apple: “We’ll sell you a great product today.”

Microsoft: “Our current products aren’t so great, but you should buy them anyway, because we’ll be releasing fantastic products a year or two from now, and then you’ll be really sorry if you bought Apple.”

- - - - -

 

Hear, hear

prev     next

Favorite links

Starbucks

Apple

Daring Fireball

RoughlyDrafted

Joel on Software

Macalope

Red Meat

Despair, Inc.

Zombie Survival Guide plus Dawn of the Dead (also check out HVZ)

Charlie Superfly Check “The First Time” to hear what she actually sang in the competition. HowardTV ripped it out and spliced in utter crap they had her sing later.

Real Solution #9 (Mambo Mania Mix) over stock nuke tests.

Ernie & Bert In Casino

Great Explanation of Star Wars

TV: Work Out; Confessions of A Matchmaker; Cavemen; Damages; The Shield

My vote for best commercial ever: Royal Bank of Scotland Group — wedding where groom says “Who among us will ever know?” I can’t find it on YouTube — anyone know where it might be?

Previous articles

Avoiding Conflict At All Costs

Behavior and Free Will, Unconfused

“Reduced To” Absurdum

Suzie and Bubba Redneck — the Carriers of Intelligence

Everything You Need To Know About Haldane’s Dilemma

Darwin + Hitler = Baloney

Meta-ware

Designed For Combat

Speed Racer R Us

Bold — Uh-huh

Conscious of Consciousness

Future Perfect

Where Real and Yahoo Went Wrong

The Purpose of Surface

Eradicating Religion Won’t Eradicate War

Documentation Overkill

A Tale of Two Movies

The Changing Face of Sam Adams

Dinesh D’Souza On ID

Why Quintic (and Higher) Polynomials Have No Algebraic Solution

Translation of Paul Graham’s Footnote To Plain English

What Happened To Moore’s Law?

Goldston On ID

The End of Martial Law

The Two Faces of Evolution

A Fine Recommendation

Free Will and Population Statistics

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — D’Souza

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — Dennett

The Non-Euclidean Geometry That Wasn’t There

Defective Attitude Towards Suburbia

The Twin Deficit Phantoms

Sleep Sync and Vertical Hold

More FUD In Your Eye

The Myth of Rubbernecking

Keeping Intelligent Design Honest

Failure of the Amiga — Not Just Mismanagement

Maxwell’s Honey Do?

End Unsecured Debt

The Digits of Pi Cannot Be Sequentially Generated By A Computer Program

Faster Is Better

Goals Can’t Be Avoided

Propped-Up Products

Ignoring ID Won’t Work

The Crabs and the Bucket

Communism As A Side Effect of the Transition To Capitalism

Google and Wikipedia, Revisited

National Geographic’s Obesity BS

Cavemen

Theodicy Is For Losers

Seattle Redux

Quitting

Living Well

A Memory of Gateway

Is Apple’s Font Rendering Really Non-Pixel-Aware?

Humans Are Complexity, Not Choice

A Subtle Shift

Moralism — The Emperor’s New Success

Code Is Our Friend

The Edge of Religion

The Dark Side of Pixel-Aware Font Rendering

The Futility of DVD Encryption

ID Isn’t About Size or Speed

Blood-Curdling Screams

ID Venn Diagram

Rich and Good-Looking? Why Libertarianism Goes Nowhere

FUV — Fear, Uncertainty, and Vista

Malware Isn’t About Total Control

Howard = Second Coming?

Doomsday? Or Just Another Sunday

The Real Function of Wikipedia In A Google World

Objective-C Philosophy

Clarity From Cisco

2007 Macworld Keynote Prediction

FUZ — Fear, Uncertainty, and Zune

No Fear — The Most Important Thing About Intelligent Design

How About A Rational Theodicy

Napster and the Subscription Model

Intelligent Design — Introduction

The One Feature I Want To See In Apple’s Safari