Darel Rex Finley in PhotoBooth

Eradicating Religion Won’t Eradicate War

2008.04.21   prev     next

I’m not religious. So please don’t take this as a defense of religion. It really isn’t.

There’s a school of thought among the anti-religious that says religion is the primary (if not sole) cause of war in human society. The theory goes something like this:

Claims of divinely revealed truth cannot be subjected to the scientific method, and therefore can be resolved only by force, which leads to war. If we would all just realize that there’s nothing outside this universe (or at least nothing relevant to our lives here), then we could resolve all disputes peacefully, via scientific tests. Then war would virtually disappear.

This thinking is wrong on multiple levels. First, I see no clear evidence that war is caused by conflicting religious claims. War occurs whenever one party is unwilling to peacefully coexist with others of differing beliefs (or others at all, for that matter). Religious differences can be peacefully discussed, or resolved with armed combat. Likewise, deep science questions (e.g. how many types of fundamental particle are there in this universe?) can be answered by experimentation and peaceful discussion of what the results mean, or they can be resolved by force, escalating all the way up to war if necessary.

And of course, the anti-religious generally have no problem with the idea of getting their way by force, whenever and wherever possible. They’re all for it. The peace they seek is not non-violent coexistence of atheists and religious in the same society. It’s the old, Soviet-style “peace” — the total victory of atheism over religion. Once that victory is complete there will be no war because there will be no need for war — no further need to eradicate religion.

Mutations

Some small level of war in the world is, I think, a necessary evil of human society. Dreams of utterly eradicating it are in the same league as dreams of eradicating money or eradicating hate.

But, I also believe, the frequency and severity of war is massively worsened by detrimental mutations that create individuals unwilling to peacefully coexist with others; individuals who want to war against others and cannot be peacefully persuaded to refrain. If you’re an atheist (or not), and you honestly want to diminish war in the world (not just win it), I would recommend that you donate not to atheism-promoting organizations (or to religious ones), but instead to genetic research foundations.

If we can cure the genetic glitches that create incorrigibly uncooperative individuals, we can win the war against war without ever firing a shot. And that might be the only way to win it.

- - - - -

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hear, hear

prev     next

Favorite links

Starbucks

Apple

Daring Fireball

RoughlyDrafted

Joel on Software

Macalope

Red Meat

Despair, Inc.

Zombie Survival Guide plus Dawn of the Dead (also check out HVZ)

Charlie Superfly Check “The First Time” to hear what she actually sang in the competition. HowardTV ripped it out and spliced in utter crap they had her sing later.

Real Solution #9 (Mambo Mania Mix) over stock nuke tests.

Ernie & Bert In Casino

Great Explanation of Star Wars

TV: Work Out; Confessions of A Matchmaker; Cavemen; Damages; The Shield

My vote for best commercial ever: Royal Bank of Scotland Group — wedding where groom says “Who among us will ever know?” I can’t find it on YouTube — anyone know where it might be?

Previous articles

Behavior and Free Will, Unconfused

“Reduced To” Absurdum

Suzie and Bubba Redneck — the Carriers of Intelligence

Everything You Need To Know About Haldane’s Dilemma

Darwin + Hitler = Baloney

Meta-ware

Designed For Combat

Speed Racer R Us

Bold — Uh-huh

Conscious of Consciousness

Future Perfect

Where Real and Yahoo Went Wrong

The Purpose of Surface

Eradicating Religion Won’t Eradicate War

Documentation Overkill

A Tale of Two Movies

The Changing Face of Sam Adams

Dinesh D’Souza On ID

Why Quintic (and Higher) Polynomials Have No Algebraic Solution

Translation of Paul Graham’s Footnote To Plain English

What Happened To Moore’s Law?

Goldston On ID

The End of Martial Law

The Two Faces of Evolution

A Fine Recommendation

Free Will and Population Statistics

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — D’Souza

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — Dennett

The Non-Euclidean Geometry That Wasn’t There

Defective Attitude Towards Suburbia

The Twin Deficit Phantoms

Sleep Sync and Vertical Hold

More FUD In Your Eye

The Myth of Rubbernecking

Keeping Intelligent Design Honest

Failure of the Amiga — Not Just Mismanagement

Maxwell’s Honey Do?

End Unsecured Debt

The Digits of Pi Cannot Be Sequentially Generated By A Computer Program

Faster Is Better

Goals Can’t Be Avoided

Propped-Up Products

Ignoring ID Won’t Work

The Crabs and the Bucket

Communism As A Side Effect of the Transition To Capitalism

Google and Wikipedia, Revisited

National Geographic’s Obesity BS

Cavemen

Theodicy Is For Losers

Seattle Redux

Quitting

Living Well

A Memory of Gateway

Is Apple’s Font Rendering Really Non-Pixel-Aware?

Humans Are Complexity, Not Choice

A Subtle Shift

Moralism — The Emperor’s New Success

Code Is Our Friend

The Edge of Religion

The Dark Side of Pixel-Aware Font Rendering

The Futility of DVD Encryption

ID Isn’t About Size or Speed

Blood-Curdling Screams

ID Venn Diagram

Rich and Good-Looking? Why Libertarianism Goes Nowhere

FUV — Fear, Uncertainty, and Vista

Malware Isn’t About Total Control

Howard = Second Coming?

Doomsday? Or Just Another Sunday

The Real Function of Wikipedia In A Google World

Objective-C Philosophy

Clarity From Cisco

2007 Macworld Keynote Prediction

FUZ — Fear, Uncertainty, and Zune

No Fear — The Most Important Thing About Intelligent Design

How About A Rational Theodicy

Napster and the Subscription Model

Intelligent Design — Introduction

The One Feature I Want To See In Apple’s Safari